10 years after Asia’s financial crisis, worries remain


http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/27/business/crisis.php



 


By Keith Bradsher


 


Published: June
 27, 2007


BANGKOK: As
the founder of a petrochemicals business empire that aggressively expanded in
refining, plastics, steel and cement, Prachai Leophairatana once ranked among 
Asia’s
wealthiest men.


But when Thailand
devalued its currency a decade ago, on July
 2, 1997 - setting off a financial crisis that engulfed nearly the
entire region - Prachai’s company was unable to keep up with payments on nearly
$3 billion in debt, much of it denominated in dollars. Today, he has recovered
somewhat, but he controls only the cement division and has not built a new
factory in the past 10 years.


His situation speaks volumes about the experience since
the Asian financial crisis, which raised alarms around the world and was
probably the most damaging detour along the road to economic globalization of
the post-Cold War era. In the past decade, Southeast Asia
has steadied itself but never regained the dazzling growth of the mid-1990s.


Looking back, an Asian Development Bank review of the five
countries most affected - Thailand,
Indonesia, Malaysia,
South Korea and
the Philippines
- found that incomes per person had recovered to at least their levels before
1997. Trade balances, foreign currency reserves, corporate governance, depth of
financial markets and quality of government regulation, as well as various
indicators of public health are now stronger than before.


Yet in all five countries, a sense of loss persists: a
sense of no longer being the darlings of foreign investors, a sense that the
best times may lie in the past, not in the future. Each economy grew more
slowly from 2000 to 2006 than from 1990 to 1996, with annual growth rates an
average of 2.5 percent below the previous period.


“The losses we have suffered are really in that sense
permanent,” said Rajat Nag, the managing director general of the Asian
Development Bank. He attributed the slower growth to greater caution about
investments on the part of governments and businesses alike.


Many others here and elsewhere in the region have been
caught up in the aftermath of the crash as well. Sirivat Voravetvuthikun
borrowed $8 million in 1995 to build two condominium towers outside Bangkok,
but he went broke during the crisis and started a small business selling
sandwiches on the streets of the capital. He predicted in early 1999 that his
company would sell shares on the stock exchange within two years. Today, he is
still predicting that a stock listing is just two years away. But he has only
expanded to two coffee shops, two kiosks and 30 sidewalk vendors because he is
scared to borrow money.


“I am afraid that I will fail again,” he said. “I’m 58
years old - I want this to be a long-lasting business for my children.”


Political instability and lingering problem bank loans
have also held back growth in several countries. A military coup in Thailand
last year and continuing political violence in the south have hurt investment
here. The Philippines
faces a Communist insurgency. Indonesia
has not entirely recovered from the rioting and toppling of the Suharto
government that accompanied the financial crisis there and from the Bali
bombings in 2002.


Finance Minister Chalongphob Sussangkarn of Thailand
said during an interview that his country had dealt with its bank loan problem
and that the economy would do better after elections, planned for late this
year.


“The likelihood of going to another financial crisis is
now low,” he said.


But he cautioned that middle-income countries like Thailand
still face challenges in coping with the large flows of money sloshing through
global capital markets, and suggested that the double-digit growth rates of the
mid-1990s were not sustainable for Thailand
or any other country over the long term. Even the Chinese economy will slow at
some point as its exports begin to saturate world markets, he predicted.


To be sure, recent economic growth of 4 percent to 7
percent a year in the five countries remains better than many developing
countries. But their performance lags behind growth rates of 9 to 11 percent in
Asia’s three current stars: China,
India and Vietnam.
Those countries offer greater political and economic stability and now attract
much of the foreign investment that once flooded southeast Asia.


Vietnam
has now surpassed Thailand
in annual cement consumption, an indicator of investment. China
is now the world’s leading steel producer. India
has become a global leader in computer software development and other
outsourcing, and is now recording double-digit growth in manufacturing as well.


The Asian financial crisis prompted considerable
discussion at the time about whether many countries in the region, acting
partly on the advice of the International Monetary Fund, had gone too far in
opening their financial markets to international investors. Hedge funds, banks,
multinational corporations and local companies all began selling local
currencies and buying dollars in a mad rush to lock in profits or repay
dollar-denominated debts in 1997.


The result was a plunge in their currencies’ value that
made it even harder for other companies, like Prachai’s empire, to repay money
they had borrowed in dollars. Some in the region are still bitter, blaming Wall
Street and Western investors in general.




“The financial people from New York
came to attack Thailand,
they acted like terrorists,” Prachai said.


More recent economic analyses have suggested, however,
that hedge funds and banks were less responsible for the downturn than a spate
of sudden selling of Asian currencies by local companies as well as by
businesses like Dell and mutual funds like the T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund,
which sought to limit their potential losses.


Malaysia
weathered the crisis better than many countries in the region by imposing
restrictions on the movement of large sums of money out of the country. That
success has called into question the international economic orthodoxy that
countries should keep their markets as open as possible at all times but not
reversed the trend toward freer trade and investment.


China,
India and Vietnam
all had severe limits on the entry and exit of short-term foreign investments
in place long before the Asian financial crisis. All three weathered it
relatively well, although the Chinese economy weakened temporarily as exports
flagged.


The three are now moving to lighten their restrictions on
money flows, but are moving at a very gradual pace that sometimes frustrates
trade and finance negotiators from the United
  States and European countries.


“We have focused on building in safeguards to be able to
pull the reins, if a crisis were to develop,” Kamal Nath, India’s
minister of commerce and industry, wrote in an e-mail message.


The country most battered by sudden capital flows in
recent months has once again been Thailand.
Faced with an incoming flood of stock and bond investments last December that
threatened to push up the value of the country’s currency and undermine the
competitiveness of Thai exports in foreign markets, the government imposed a
requirement that effectively taxed short-term foreign investments.


But when the Thai stock market immediately plunged 15
percent in a day, the government promptly lifted the restriction for
investments in equities.


In a less noticed move, however, the Thai government has
made a series of adjustments over the past few months that have had the effect
of keeping limits on foreign investors who bring large sums into the country
for the purchase of fixed-income securities.


Aside from financial disruptions, another lingering worry
for the five countries hit by the financial crisis is that while their exports
to China have
increased, they remain dependent on American consumers. Many Asian countries
used to ship electronics and other goods directly to the United
  States. Today they tend to ship components
to China, where
they are assembled and shipped to American households.


“Asia will need to prepare for a
future in which it relies more on the strength of growth at home rather than on
the strength of growth in the rest of the world,” said Timothy Geithner, the
president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.






      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel 
and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



=====================================================
Pojok Milis Komunitas FPK:

1.Milis komunitas FPK dibuat dan diurus oleh pembaca setia KOMPAS
2.Topik bahasan disarankan bersumber dari KOMPAS dan KOMPAS On-Line (KCM)
3.Moderator berhak mengedit/menolak E-mail sebelum diteruskan ke anggota
4.Kontak moderator E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.Untuk bergabung: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

KOMPAS LINTAS GENERASI
=====================================================
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Forum-Pembaca-Kompas/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Forum-Pembaca-Kompas/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke