On 6 June 2018 at 10:45, Kyle Shannon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:44 AM Richard Hipp wrote:
>>
>> On 6/6/18, Kyle Shannon wrote:
>> > Our security team found another XSS, shall I forward the link to the list?
>>
>> Yes, please
>> --
>> D. Richard Hipp
>> d...@sqlite.org
>
> https://www.fo
On 24 January 2018 at 11:50, Richard Hipp wrote:
> The 3.22.0 final release of SQLite is checked into Fossil now, so it
> seems like a good time to do the 2.5 release of Fossil as well. I
> have reviewed the timeline
> (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?from=release&to=trunk) and
> attem
here's a typo:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact?ln=1&name=3976b258aa4c62c9
It's need to be Its
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
Thus said Zakero on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:02:36 -0500
On Jul 6, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
Question 1: "References" seems like the wrong section label. But I
cannot come up with anything better. I also tried "Referenced By",
but that seems even worse. Suggestions?
I'll throw som
Hi Dr. Hipp,
On 6 July 2017 at 07:22, Richard Hipp wrote:
> The /info webpage now includes a section called "References" which
> shows all other check-ins or tickets or wiki that make reference to
> the check-in being displayed by the /info page. In other words, if
> you have two check-ins "a123
On 6 July 2017 at 07:22, Richard Hipp wrote:
> The /info webpage now includes a section called "References" which
> shows all other check-ins or tickets or wiki that make reference to
> the check-in being displayed by the /info page. In other words, if
> you have two check-ins "a1234" and 'b9876"
On 6 July 2017 at 07:22, Richard Hipp wrote:
> The /info webpage now includes a section called "References" which
> shows all other check-ins or tickets or wiki that make reference to
> the check-in being displayed by the /info page. In other words, if
> you have two check-ins "a1234" and 'b9876"
Hi,
What about a suggestion to limit the login expiration time. Currently it
has a setting of 8766 hours. Perhaps that can be adjusted in the code or
recommended in the new page.
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://maili
On 02/27/2017 11:43 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On Feb 26, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
(9) Can a Fossil 1.x client push/pull/clone from a Fossil 2.0 server,
assuming the repository uses SHA1 has it preferred hash algorithm?
This is desirable, but I am willing to sacrifice this capability
On Jan 2, 2017 11:15 AM, "Richard Hipp" wrote:
>
> SQLite version 3.16.0 is now checked into Fossil. Perhaps this would
> be a good time to do another release of Fossil.
>
Perhaps towards the end of the month to see if any small sqlite bugs found
that cause a small point release?
> Key enhancem
On 27 October 2016 at 06:05, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> I am having trouble figuring out how to get the exact number
>
two more to go:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/stat
Although that's in all branches, right?
> --
> ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
>
--
---
inum: 8
On 14 October 2016 at 07:47, Richard Hipp wrote:
> The final SQLite 3.15.0 is not checked into the Fossil trunk. Is it
> an appropriate time to release version 1.36 of Fossil?
Couple things...
fossil download page says the binary is for openBSD 5.x. Is one needed
for 6.x now?
http://fossil-scm.o
Sent from my iPhone 7.1
On Oct 14, 2016 7:47 AM, "Richard Hipp" wrote:
>
> The final SQLite 3.15.0 is not checked into the Fossil trunk. Is it
> an appropriate time to release version 1.36 of Fossil?
>
SQLite is NOT checked in to fossil? Is it worth waiting?
> --
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlit
On 13 June 2016 at 05:53, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 6/10/16, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> Any objections to cutting the Fossil 1.35 release sometime early next week?
>
> There have been a few minor patches and some merges since the
> previous. Are there any further objections to doing version 1.35
> la
On 10 June 2016 at 07:01, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Any objections to cutting the Fossil 1.35 release sometime early next week?
>
Is there anything worthy of being in this release from the pending
review branch:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?n=100&r=pending-review
> --
> D. Richard Hip
On 18 March 2016 at 11:49, Richard Hipp wrote:
> old-style: http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=e3c529c
> new-style: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?c=e3c529c
I'm in favor of the new style! Definitely looks like fewer
forks...even though both are fork-less.
Thanks for the
On 3 November 2015 at 22:19, jungle Boogie wrote:
> You have the option to view ancestry, annotate, blame and check-ins
> using, but not the file's actual history.
I stand corrected. You just have to click on the file name:
File src/login.c — part of check-in [9271b4bb] at 2015-09-
On 2 November 2015 at 10:27, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Fossil 1.34 has been tagged and is now on the website. Time to think
> about what to do next. The following are ideas:
There may already be an elegant way to handle this and if there is,
please share!
When viewing this file:
http://www.fossil-
On 2 November 2015 at 10:27, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Fossil 1.34 has been tagged and is now on the website. Time to think
> about what to do next. The following are ideas:
just some rambling thoughts...
Is there a technical limitation why tech notes are not searchable?
http://www.mail-archive.co
Hi All,
On 18 May 2015 at 07:30, Richard Hipp wrote:
> I tried andygoth-brackets-outside-links. I like it better the old
> way, with the brackets as part of the hyperlinks. You are going to
> need to sell me on omitting the brackets from the links.
Just FYI that I discovered but others may be a
Hi Stephen,
On 11 June 2015 at 05:37, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> management summary/TL;DR: what (non-emacs) programming editor do you *nix
> users use for hacking on fossil?
Good to hear that you're improving!
Cross platform and open source:
http://komodoide.com/komodo-edit/
You could e
Dr. Hipp,
On 19 May 2015 at 09:57, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/19/15, jungle Boogie wrote:
>> Dr. Hipp,
>> On 18 May 2015 at 13:03, Richard Hipp wrote:
>>> End with two new-lines.
>>> (5) See where the segfault happens and start debugging.
>>
>> I
Dr. Hipp,
On 18 May 2015 at 13:03, Richard Hipp wrote:
> End with two new-lines.
> (5) See where the segfault happens and start debugging.
I'm sorry but it's not yet painfully obvious to me where this seg fault is:
/reports?type=a&view=bymonth&u=drh&user=andybradford
Selecting a different user
On 18 May 2015 at 12:24, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/18/15, Richard Hipp wrote:
>>
>> andygoth-user-reports is good but needs more love before it goes onto
>> trunk. In particular, the submenu is too wide. I think the "(Remove
>> User Flag)" submenu item definitely needs to go away. General cle
On 7 May 2015 at 11:22, Andy Goth wrote:
> On 5/6/2015 10:24 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> I've been experimenting with generating SVG pie charts in the
>> "piechart" branch.
>
> Looks quite good, but I miss having the actual numbers. An isolated pie
> chart shows relative magnitudes with no scale c
Hi,
On 18 March 2015 at 10:53, Richard Hipp wrote:
> but I now have the head of that branch running on the main server so
> that you can try it out:
> https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci
>
> Please provide feedback.
It's also very nice on James' skin:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/blitz
26 matches
Mail list logo
