Op 16 aug. 2015 19:45 schreef "Chris Drexler" het
volgende:
> I overlooked that those files would not get cleaned up either then :-(.
It is possible to set ignore-glob as you suggest and still do a full clean:
just use "fossil clean -x". That's what I use in my repositories.
"fossil clean" only
Am 16.08.2015 um 19:11 schrieb Joe Mistachkin:
Chris Drexler wrote:
So what do you think? Is it OK to add or rather not?
I don't think they should be in ignore-glob, no. It would [normally]
prevent the "extras" command from seeing them and the "clean" command
from removing them.
I overlook
Chris Drexler wrote:
>
> So what do you think? Is it OK to add or rather not?
>
I don't think they should be in ignore-glob, no. It would [normally]
prevent the "extras" command from seeing them and the "clean" command
from removing them.
--
Joe Mistachkin
_
Hi Joe,
sorry, but I don't understand your comment. I thought the behaviorthat
fossil does not see those files would be exactly what is wanted. E.g. you
can do a "fossil add ." in the root and you would only get the really new
files added and no build artifacts. Same with "extra" where you would
That's not what ignore-glob does. It prevents "fossil extra" from seeing those
files.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 15, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Chris wrote:
>
> Hi again
>
> what would you think about updating the .ignore-glob to contain build
> artifacts on Linux:
>
> --- .fossil-settings/ignore
Hi again
what would you think about updating the .ignore-glob to contain build
artifacts on Linux:
--- .fossil-settings/ignore-glob
+++ .fossil-settings/ignore-glob
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
compat/openssl*
compat/tcl*
fossil
fossil.exe
win/fossil.exe
+bld/*
+config.log
+Makefile
+autoconfig.h
IM
