Ok. Some like circles, most seem not to. Some like branch rail colors,
some do not and there are issues with low-contrast background colors.
Here is my latest proposal: I've made them each a setting.
@Andy Bradford: My proposal is partially CSS configurable.
Skins may set...
- default branch
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Andy Bradford <
amb-sendok-1429395023.fedjmknnbjlmkfmlh...@bradfords.org> wrote:
> Thus said Scott Robison on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:26:47 -0600:
>
> > The additional problem with color vision deficiency is that even if we
> > found a set of colors that I could alw
Thus said Scott Robison on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:26:47 -0600:
> The additional problem with color vision deficiency is that even if we
> found a set of colors that I could always differentiate and always
> rely on, who knows if other color deficient people would see it the
> same way I do.
H
I love the colored lines concept, the colors help the eye track. But the
colored lines need to be bolder to stand out from the white background.
I'm not sure if best answer is to pick line color from a different
palette, add a pixel or so to their width (subtracted from the existing
white space
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> i love the circles but the yellow lines aren't terribly helpful on a white
> background.
>
And maybe even less so for me! I don't begrudge other people their pretty
colors (I like pretty colors, or at least colors my eyes find pretty which
mi
i love the circles but the yellow lines aren't terribly helpful on a white
background.
- stephan
(Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity,
typos, and top-posting.)
On Mar 19, 2015 9:17 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote:
> The circular node patch is available for experiment
The circular node patch is available for experimental viewing at
https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil-ex
I started looking at the graph-test page
(https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil-ex/doc/trunk/test/graph-test-1.wiki)
and I see that the very first link
(https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil-ex/time
I see it on Chrome too. It's isolated to top-down rails and fixed in the
included bundle.
I added a new side-by-side comparison image:
http://gitblit.com/other/graph-clarity2.png
Reminds me of guitar tablature.
-J
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 3/19/15, James Moge
On 3/19/15, James Moger wrote:
>
> Color choices aside, I I have all but one issue resolved and that one would
> be addressed by specifying rail color separately from bg color (tag color
> is used as a segment color which I consider a bug but the fix require
> deeper changes).
>
Consider this gra
> pleasantly surprised that I saw no circles (primarily because I
prefer the squares). :-)
Hehe, well maybe I can change your mind.
Color choices aside, I I have all but one issue resolved and that one would
be addressed by specifying rail color separately from bg color (tag color
is used as a
Thus said James Moger on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:09:50 -0400:
> It surprises me that IceWeasel has trouble with border-radius. Being
> Debian can I assume it is an older IceWeasel?
Yes, it's a bit older---so take it with a grain of salt, but, I was
pleasantly surprised that I saw no circles (
On 3/19/15, James Moger wrote:
> My previous post might be unclear. There is a scrubbed image attachment
> which compares what's running on fossil-scm.org with my current changes.
>
The colors used for the lines are background colors, which might be
very close to the overall background color and
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:09 PM, James Moger wrote:
> The idea is to de-emphasize the branch runs & correlate them with their
> changes. There are a few segment color glitches (i.e. some segments are
> black when they should not be). The merge lines don't touch - that can be
> tweaked.
>
Look
My previous post might be unclear. There is a scrubbed image attachment
which compares what's running on fossil-scm.org with my current changes.
I've uploaded the image here: http://gitblit.com/other/graph-clarity.png
-J
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fos
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:20:01 +0100:
>
> > Not true - branch point leaves have lines going out.
>
> Oh yes, I too had forgotten about those.
>
> By the way, welcome back. :-)
>
Only partially - my pinky still doesn't l
Richard Hipp wrote:
Maybe circles should be used in all cases? Or maybe the use of
circles versus squares should be a skin-selectable option?
It should be possible to allow every graph element to be modified in
CSS. Then each skin author can choose how they want to style nodes,
lines, arrows
Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 19 Mar 2015 01:20:01 +0100:
> Not true - branch point leaves have lines going out.
Oh yes, I too had forgotten about those.
By the way, welcome back. :-)
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000550a19e7
___
fossil-dev mailin
Not true - branch point leaves have lines going out.
- stephan
(Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity,
typos, and top-posting.)
On Mar 19, 2015 1:06 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
> Right, so only the ends of each branch would get that shape (whichever it
> is). OTO
Right, so only the ends of each branch would get that shape (whichever it
is). OTOH, that doesn't add any new info because one sees leaves easily by
the fact that they only have a line leading into them, not out of. But the
circles just look so nice :).
- stephan
(Sent from a mobile device, p
Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 23:13:56 +0100:
> How about one for leaves and the other for non-leaves?
Isn't a leaf easily identified by the fact that it has no descendents
(as indicated by no edges leaving the node)?
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000550a06c1
How about one for leaves and the other for non-leaves? The circles look
really nice but, as you say, don't add any new info in their current role.
- stephan
(Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity,
typos, and top-posting.)
On Mar 18, 2015 9:56 PM, "Richard Hipp" w
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:56:24 -0400:
> Maybe circles should be used in all cases? Or maybe the use of circles
> versus squares should be a skin-selectable option?
I prefer boxes over circles, so definitely if there is a strong desire
to use circles instead of boxes, then
On 3/18/15, Kees Nuyt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:53:14 -0400, you wrote:
>>Please provide feedback.
>
> Looks great!
>
They do look good, don't they.
However, after living with them for a few hours, I now realize that
the circles do not provide any new information. I can already clearly
se
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:53:14 -0400, you wrote:
>James Moger sent in a bundle that provides for circular nodes on the
>timeline - reverting to square nodes if the check-in is a merge. This
>strikes me as an intriguing idea. The change is still on a branch
>(https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timel
Sometimes the merge lines do not quite touch the circle. For example:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/gitblit/timeline?c=2014-11-19+16:17:59
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailing
Thus said Jan Danielsson on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:21:02 +0100:
> No problems rendering on this system; it Just Works(tm).
It doesn't render on my Debian system which uses Iceweasel (same code
base for Firefox, with policy infringing things removed I believe).
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 400055
Thus said Scott Robison on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:03:49 -0600:
> Or hearts & spades & clubs. Maybe pacman & qbert.
Or maybe, hopefully, this can be controlled via CSS...
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 40005509d65b
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mail
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:53:14 -0400:
> https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci
I've found that in some browsers, all nodes look like squares, not sure
why.
That being said, I prefer a blocky thing with edges to a no-corners
thing when line oriented data is
Hi,
On 18 March 2015 at 10:53, Richard Hipp wrote:
> but I now have the head of that branch running on the main server so
> that you can try it out:
> https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci
>
> Please provide feedback.
It's also very nice on James' skin:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/blitz
On 18/03/15 18:53, Richard Hipp wrote:
[---]
> Please provide feedback.
I like this a lot.
No problems rendering on this system; it Just Works(tm).
--
Kind Regards,
Jan
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailin
On 3/18/15, Scott Robison wrote:
> >
> I like shape differentiation. It is kind to my color blind eyes. :)
>
> I'm still newbie enough at this stuff to not have a ton of hard earned
> opinions (other than I dislike using git) but I know I've read about
> desires for other symbols to indicate diffe
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> James Moger sent in a bundle that provides for circular nodes on the
> timeline - reverting to square nodes if the check-in is a merge. This
> strikes me as an intriguing idea. The change is still on a branch
> (https://www.fossil-scm.org/
James Moger sent in a bundle that provides for circular nodes on the
timeline - reverting to square nodes if the check-in is a merge. This
strikes me as an intriguing idea. The change is still on a branch
(https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?r=differentiate-timeline)
but I now have the hea
33 matches
Mail list logo
