Much simpler patch checked in at
https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/5826ba37acff82bb
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> Thanks for pointing that out.
> On the other hand (being pedantic), maybe the second argument "HEAD",
> being of type char [5], and thus passed as type (char *) to
> fossil_strcmp(), should be casted to (const char*), right?
>
> > - if (fossil
Thanks for pointing that out.
On the other hand (being pedantic), maybe the second argument "HEAD",
being of type char [5], and thus passed as type (char *) to
fossil_strcmp(), should be casted to (const char*), right?
> - if (fossil_strcmp((char*)P("REQUEST_METHOD"),"HEAD")!=0)
> + if (fossil_
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Johan Kuuse wrote:
> + if (fossil_strcmp((char*)P("REQUEST_METHOD"),"HEAD")!=0)
>
One minor nitpick:
fossil_strcmp() takes a const char *, which is the return type of P(), so
no cast is needed there.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan
Hi again,
A question: Are attachments scrubbed on the fossil-dev mailing lists?
I see in the two links below that the patch I attached yesterday isn't
included in the message:
https://marc.info/?l=fossil-dev&m=149909778525770&w=2
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/fossil-dev/2
Hi,
I see that the upcoming fossil 2.3 release coming up soon, so there
may be other (higher) priorities and interests right now, but I post
this patch here and now anyway, for the record.
Playing around with the "fossil http" command, I found a bug in the
behavior for the HTTP HEAD method.
htt
