> So I thought that might have meant multiple, distinct trees, similar to
> how one can have branches in Git with independent directory structures
> but all separate from each other, even if they are stored in the same
> repository.
>
> I'm wondering how difficult/desirable it might be to support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fossil's all-in-one idea is starting to grow on me. Last night I read
about branching and tagging, which sparked a thought on how to do a
multi-project setup. I'f tested it and it works superficially, but I'm
wondering if there's something inherent in
I'm using that patch.
Sorry. Looks like I fixed one problem and introduced two or three more.
Another patch is up. Please let me know if you can find anything wrong with
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/ci/7aae4ef068
Note that you can type:
fossil test-url http://user:passw...@www.fossil
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Prithish wrote:
>
> Thanks Richard for the prompt reply. It would be great if an automated way
> can be implemented into fossil. I switch between Windows and Linux quiet
> often. Some of the neat linux commands don't have equivalent in Windows.
>
Here is the comma
Richard Hipp schrieb:
(...)
Sorry for being offtopic, but as I encountered it right now, I would
like to ask, why do you (and others as well in similar situation) use a
command line like this
> fossil rm `fossil status | grep MISSING | awk '{print $2}'`
instead of a simplified version like
5 matches
Mail list logo
