On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:09:58PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Joshua Paine wrote:
>
> >
> > It would be nice to have something like `git stash`, too. Probably the
> > biggest thing I miss from git.
> >
> >
> I've been reading up on git-stash to see if Fossil nee
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:09:58 -05 wrote:
Richard> So in summary - Fossil appears to already do everything that
Richard> git-stash does and do it at least as easily as git-stash.
Richard> Furthermore, I think for the sake of usability that is
Richard> important to keep Fossil as simple as possible a
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Joshua Paine wrote:
>
> It would be nice to have something like `git stash`, too. Probably the
> biggest thing I miss from git.
>
>
I've been reading up on git-stash to see if Fossil needs a similar feature.
So far I don't see the need, since stash doesn't do anyt
If I have local changes that I haven't checked in, and the merge would
conflict with those changes, including by deleting my file, fossil
should say something like:
Hey, this merge will conflict with your uncommitted changes to:
* File X
* File Y
Commit your changes or use --force to merge anywa
4 matches
Mail list logo
