Am Donnerstag 16 Dezember 2010, 15:37:00 schrieb pablo veliz:
> Since we are using a browser to see the code, why not use a client side
> library for syntax-highlighting like http://codemirror.net/ ? That way
> works in any platform, and can be extended for different languages.
>
> -Original M
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:59:14 -0800
>> "Russ" == Russ Paielli wrote:
Russ> Here's another suggestion for comments. The idea of launching an
Russ> editor seems excessive to me. When I'm working remotely, it
Russ> sometimes takes half a minute or so for the editor to come up. If
Russ> the user ne
This is interesting. Where can I get consolidated recipe?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Volodya Savastiouk, MSC
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Dec 17, 2010 12:13 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Hello. Anyone for source highlighting?
Hi,
I did ment
+1
-Original Message-
From: pablo veliz
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Dec 16, 2010 8:07 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Hello. Anyone for source highlighting?
Since we are using a browser to see the code, why not use a client side
library for syntax-highlighting li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have some situations where I find myself creating the same starter
projects over and over. For instance, I'll create the same starter web
app with similar database setup and coding style.
Were I doing this with Git, I'd start with a template reposit
Here's another suggestion for comments. The idea of launching an editor
seems excessive to me. When I'm working remotely, it sometimes takes half a
minute or so for the editor to come up. If the user neglects to enter a "-m"
comment, why not issue a query such as, "Do you wish to enter a comment?
[
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Rene wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:44:46 -0800, Russ Paielli
> wrote:
>
> > I downloaded fossil and gave it a try on my Linux machine. The first
> > time I tried to add files, I got stuck in some mode that I could not
> > get out of. Apparently, my EDITOR envir
Hi,
I did mentioned it here a few days back, the source highlighting can
work with *no* changes to Fossil. I have it working for me on
chiselapp.com. What will be great is if the html output can be
configured to have more classes/div/id to be used in CSS.
I'm not sur
I also agree that words:
"original content"
and
"conflict"
are very clear for a person who understands very well the merge
algorithm. However, they might be not so clear for a casual user.
People would understand better something like:
"local checkout"
"files from repository"
or somethi
On Dec 16, 2010, at 16:11 , Richard Hipp wrote:
> I really do not want to make merge-conflict marks configurable. Aren't
> there enough configuration options in Fossil already? Do we really need the
> extra complication.
I hope not.
>
> As of a check-in a did moments ago, the conflict marks
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:43 AM, wrote:
>
> My understanding is that Fossil supports renames of files and
> directories, but does not support merges that later use the deprecated
> name. This is something of a race condition and might be a concern for
> projects with lots of disparate contributors
I really do not want to make merge-conflict marks configurable. Aren't
there enough configuration options in Fossil already? Do we really need the
extra complication.
As of a check-in a did moments ago, the conflict marks now look like this:
<<< BEGIN MERGE CONFLICT: original content fi
I'm interested in this idea.
And I thought to try develop "new default" skin for fossil in fancy
web 2.0 style and with syntax highlighting, however I was considering
http://alexgorbatchev.com/SyntaxHighlighter/
If you're interested, we can discuss our next steps.
--
@macacq
On Thu, Dec 16, 2
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:17:29 +
fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org wrote:
> I'm inclined to go with the shorter one-line conflict marks. Other
> thoughts from the user community?
Love the idea to add context to the conflict lines. How about a
compromise solution? Like:
0
1
2
3
<<<
On Dec 15, 2010, at 22:10 , Joshua Paine wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 04:00 PM, Zach Todd wrote:
>> I have updated the merge conflict code as well as config setup to
>> allow for configurable notation.
>
>> Doesn't this call for configurable notation? ;)
>> Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski
>
> Ma
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote:
>
>> 2) Should we consider using relative URLs instead of absolute?
>>
>
> That sounds like it is the right solution. But it is a big change. It
> will likely take a week or two to ap
Quoting Russ Paielli :
> ... At first I was interested in Git and BitKeeper. Then I discovered
> Bazaar, and I was almost ready to start using it, but I decided to take one
> more look at the options. When I saw fossil, I figured, with a name like
> that, it's a real long shot, but I'll take a loo
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:22:42PM +0200, Trou Macacq wrote:
> About fossil server... on production (not ad hoc) this means using
> inetd daemon. And I might say something stupid, but I'm almost sure it
> not installed on my Ubuntu server 10.10 by default. And I trying to
> keep everything as stand
Since we are using a browser to see the code, why not use a client side library
for syntax-highlighting like http://codemirror.net/ ?
That way works in any platform, and can be extended for different languages.
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org
[mailto:fo
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Trou Macacq wrote:
> connected with HTTP_HOST env variable... And this env variable cannot
> be changed either in CGI script using bash, or by using SetEnv
> mod_rewreite directive.
You'll want to do one of two things here:
(1) You'll want to investigate how I'm
Hi
I've tried to solve my issue by using Apache mod_env and
mod_rewrite... I'm might be wrong but zBaseURL variable somehow
connected with HTTP_HOST env variable... And this env variable cannot
be changed either in CGI script using bash, or by using SetEnv
mod_rewreite directive.
About fossil ser
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote:
> My setup look like this:
>
> ngnix reverse proxy, port 80 <-> apache daemon running fossil via CGI, port
> 8080
>
> And since fossil sets absolute URL to all resources embedded... the
> people outside have seem my repositories wiki, tickets, a
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:20:02AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote:
>
> > 2) Should we consider using relative URLs instead of absolute?
> >
>
> That sounds like it is the right solution. But it is a big change. It will
> likely take a week or tw
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote:
> 2) Should we consider using relative URLs instead of absolute?
>
That sounds like it is the right solution. But it is a big change. It will
likely take a week or two to appear.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_
Hi all!
Thank you all for such a great tool as fossil!
I've become big fan of the fossil SCM some time ago and past few days
I spent finally moving fossil repositories to the production server (I
need some sort of centralized hosting for all my stuff) and funny
thing happened -- fossil let me dow
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:44:46 -0800, Russ Paielli
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I discovered fossil yesterday while reading the Wikipedia page that
> compares version control systems. I read lots of the material on the
> fossil website, and I must say that fossil looks very promising.
> Congratulations
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:50:52PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:33:29PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > Having incomplete changes in the tree is bad for things like bisect.
> > > It s
27 matches
Mail list logo
