Re: [fossil-users] Can't open cloned repository

2011-02-01 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Nolan Darilek wrote: > fossil: incorrect repository schema version > fossil: you have version "2010-11-24" but you need version "2011-01-28" > fossil: run "fossil rebuild" to fix this problem > i had that exact same problem on several machines. After doing fossi

[fossil-users] Can't open cloned repository

2011-02-01 Thread Nolan Darilek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I noticed earlier tonight, after upgrading Fossil and rebuilding, that I couldn't update the fossil-scm.org repository anymore due to having an incompatible schema version. Seemed a bit odd, but I figured that if I recloned the repository and started o

[fossil-users] is such a link possible in fossil?

2011-02-01 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all! i'm trying to download a raw, un-wikified, un-'d text file using AJAX in my fossil header, but /raw is failing me and i'm curious how to do this: /raw/file.txt?name=de6f839 works - it feeds me the whole file. If i pass 'trunk' or 'tip' as the file then i instead get the manifest. Is th

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with repos shared over network

2011-02-01 Thread Gé Weijers
I would suggest running the problematic fossil command and capturing the system call trace using 'strace -o LOG fossil '. It's usually easy enough to figure out the problem from the last dozen or so lines from the 'LOG' file. Ge' ___ fossil-users ma

[fossil-users] possible? pushing from ui mode...

2011-02-01 Thread Stephan Beal
Hello again! Suppose for a moment that when i edit a wiki page using "fossil ui", that i want fossil to automatically push the repo when i save changes. Can i hack fossil to do that with little effort, or would the current infrastructure not allow me to do that? -- - stephan beal http://wand

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with repos shared over network

2011-02-01 Thread Joshua Paine
On Jan 31, 2011, at 9:27 PM, "G. Clifford Williams" wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:36:08AM -0500, Joshua Paine spake: >> Just read your message again--I think you indicated that you're sharing a >> single working copy over the network. That's kind of crazy, and not at all >> recommende