Re: [fossil-users] self-register

2011-08-13 Thread Tomek Kott
Under the web ui, you can find it under Admin > Access, a couple options down. I haven't used it myself, but that's where the option is! Tomek On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Taylor Everding wrote: > I found reference to a 'self-register' setting at > http://www.sqlite.org/debug1/help/setting,

[fossil-users] self-register

2011-08-13 Thread Taylor Everding
I found reference to a 'self-register' setting at http://www.sqlite.org/debug1/help/setting, however after downloading the latest version from http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html, and `fossil help setting` I could not find it. Is this a new feature, a different branch, or something else. Thank

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for, merging

2011-08-13 Thread alaric
How about always calling new files .fossil (and accepting existing other names), *and* setting the hidden flag on Windows? Then the documentation is the same for both: a hidden file called .fossil... --Original Message-- From: Steve Havelka Sender: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.or

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for, merging

2011-08-13 Thread Steve Havelka
> Having _different_ defaults complicates both documentation and support, and > i highly recommend against it. > I would normally agree, but when the two platforms have different methods to hide files, I think it's fair to use the native method for each. I'd support defaulting to .fos or .foss

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 03:46:18PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote: > On 13 August 2011 07:31, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > > (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_ as hidden on Windows, > > that would be good too). > > > > The ATTRIB command isn't working for you? Let me add: "without calli

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: > I'd go with .fossil as default on Unix (there is really no good reason to > limit ourselves to 3 letters here) and hidden _FOSSIL_ on Windows. > Having _different_ defaults complicates both documentation and support, and i highly re

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Aug 13, 2011, at 00:42 , Richard Hipp wrote: >> Most notably shell's glob ignores dotfiles, what makes them mostly a >> non-issue for me... And I find the _FOSSIL_ string particularly disturbing >> on listings. >> > > You know you can rename _FOSSIL_ as .fos, right? > > mv _FOSSIL_ .fos

Re: [fossil-users] New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Ben Summers
On 12 Aug 2011, at 22:39, Mike Meyer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Ben Summers wrote: >> On 12 Aug 2011, at 20:44, Mike Meyer wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym >> wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> On 08/12/201

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Michael Richter
On 13 August 2011 07:31, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_ as hidden on Windows, > that would be good too). > The ATTRIB command isn't working for you? -- "Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout all of the discussions of entering China our focus