Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > [stephan@cheyenne:~/cvs/fossil/whio/pfs]$ f stash pop > f: ./bld/blob_.c:786: blob_write_to_file: Assertion > `(pBlob)->xRealloc==blobReallocMalloc || > (pBlob)->xRealloc==blobReallocStatic' failed. > Aborted > [stephan@cheyenne:~/cvs/fossil/

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: > I have just commited the code to update local tables. > Yeah :). Stash works again :). Well, halfway... This is fossil version 1.19 [8c0f4bc718] 2011-08-27 01:21:42 UTC save works, but pop/apply don't: [stephan@cheyenne:~/cvs/fossil/wh

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Aug 27, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > There is no --branch option to the open command. i probably could have passed > the branch name as the version (didn't think about it and never needed it > before). No big deal. The few changes i munged were about to be thrown out > anyway. Ye

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: > > What i was trying to do was stash uncommitted changes from the branch so > that i could go back to the trunk. When stashing failed, a close left me > with the branch's state + my uncommitted changes. A re-open brought me to > the trunk,

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
> What i was trying to do was stash uncommitted changes from the branch so that > i could go back to the trunk. When stashing failed, a close left me with the > branch's state + my uncommitted changes. A re-open brought me to the trunk, > and my pre-commit state is such that the trunk thinks it

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: > Yeah, I haven't written code to alter stash and undo tables that already > exist in local _FOSSIL_ database with the new isLink column yet. If you > close and reopen repository, they'll be recreated. > Doh... that was a bad idea. My chang

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Ross Berteig
At 04:24 PM 8/26/2011, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: >On Aug 26, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Tomek Kott wrote: >>> >>> http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?n=200 >>> >>> Side note: is it me, or are the lines only showing up on the >normal (n=20) >> timeline view? Perhaps the lines would just be too com

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Aug 27, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Possible bug: can't stash :( > > [stephan@cheyenne:~/cvs/fossil/whio]$ f stash save -m 'some threading code i > will probably toss out.' > f: SQLITE_ERROR: table stashfile has no column named isLink > f: table stashfile has no column named isLink

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > It's been a long time since there has been an official release of Fossil. > Probably I should do another soon > Possible bug: can't stash :( [stephan@cheyenne:~/cvs/fossil/whio]$ f stash save -m 'some threading code i will probably tos

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Aug 26, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Tomek Kott wrote: >> >> >> Case in point: >> >> http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?n=200 >> >> Side note: is it me, or are the lines only showing up on the normal (n=20) > timeline view? Perhaps the lines would just be too complicated? Using FF6. 200 entries wor

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Jeff Slutter
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > It's been a long time since there has been an official release of Fossil. > Probably I should do another soon > > To that end, I'm asking folks to please test the trunk. I use the trunk > routinely, so it should be stable. But the more

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Gé Weijers wrote: > > Recently the flag '-showfiles' was added to 'fossil timeline'. It shows > which files were added, deleted or modified in each commit. The next release > should contain this feature. > FWIW, the "showfiles" option has been available on the w

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Gé Weijers
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Gilles wrote: I'm not very clear at what a manifest is: www.sqlite.org/debug1/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki It seems to be a list of artifacts (ie. changes?) for each file under source control. The manifest describes a committed revision. It's mostly file names and ha

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:27:50 -0400, Tomek Kott wrote: > To be honest I'm not either -- I don't use them personally. I believe it >is used for auditing puproses, since it contains checksums of the files, the >user, and timestamp. I can live with that. Telling Fossil to stop watching a file is not

[fossil-users] Graph display issue with FF. Was: Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Tomek Kott wrote: > >> Case in point: >> >> http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?n=200 >> >> Side note: is it me, or are the lines only showing up on the normal (n=20) > timeline view? Perhaps the lines would just be too complicated? Using FF6. > That bug is here:

Re: [fossil-users] Where to report mistakes in the documentation

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Sean McCleary wrote: > 'A *property* is a name/value pair. Internally, fossil implements tags as > properties with a NULL value. ... The *branch* tag tells (by its value) > what branch the check-in is a member of. The default branch is called > "trunk".' > > The "

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Tomek Kott wrote: > Side note: is it me, or are the lines only showing up on the normal (n=20) >> timeline view? Perhaps the lines would just be too complicated? Using FF6. >> > Works for me in Chrome, but yes an HTML canvas that size might annoy some browsers.

[fossil-users] Where to report mistakes in the documentation

2011-08-26 Thread Sean McCleary
Hi fossil user list, I was reading the online documentation about branching and tagging, and think I spotted a mistake. It looks like anonymous users don't have access to change the wiki though, and I couldn't find a link to report mistakes or something. Anyone know? FYI, the mistake is: 'A *p

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Matt Welland
I have switched to the new "trunk" and I think it address the issue I had with symlinks (sent in separate mail). Thanks! The empty-dirs works as advertised but I have an enhancement request. If I specify a multilevel directory and the upper levels do not exist the directory is silently skipped. Ei

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Tomek Kott
> > > Case in point: > > http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?n=200 > > Side note: is it me, or are the lines only showing up on the normal (n=20) timeline view? Perhaps the lines would just be too complicated? Using FF6. Tomek ___ fossil-users mailing lis

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Tomek Kott
> I'm not very clear at what a manifest is: > > To be honest I'm not either -- I don't use them personally. I believe it is used for auditing puproses, since it contains checksums of the files, the user, and timestamp. www.sqlite.org/debug1/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki > > It seems to be a list

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > In the timeline view its unlikely that more than a few branches will be > visible for any given timeframe unless the user expands the list to 200 > entries. But then the branch lines can be used to disambiguate. > Case in point: http://www.

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > I'm not arguing against the auto-coloring. I like it and I think it will > be a real help. I do think that making similar names similar colors is > an anti-goal or at least a non-goal. But in fairness: the majority of the colors shown in the

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:26:24 -0400, Tomek Kott wrote: >Do you mean a list of all files that have ever been deleted throughout the >repository? Or a list of the files deleted in the last commit? I meant the former: Checking out the latest revision of a file which has at some point been deleted fro

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Brian Smith
I read a paper awhile back that talked about the minimum distance necessary being 40 something, but I believe that eas in ciexyz colorspace. On Aug 26, 2011 12:39 PM, "Joshua Paine" wrote: > On 8/26/2011 3:11 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: >> It *could* be a feature, not a bug.. I mean.. if 2 branches h

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Joshua Paine
On 8/26/2011 3:11 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > It *could* be a feature, not a bug.. I mean.. if 2 branches have so > similar name.. it might be wanted behavior to have very similar color... If two branches have almost the same name, it's much more likely that I actually meant them to be the same an

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > >> It *could* be a feature, not a bug.. I mean.. if 2 branches have so >> similar name.. it might be wanted behavior to have very similar color... >> > > LOL! That's a very interesting

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Updating now, and i'm using fossil heavily tonight, so i'll put it through > my routine. (That said, my routine won't stress it all that much.) > For anyone skeptical about upgrading, i just upgraded all of my remote repos and "the world is

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > It *could* be a feature, not a bug.. I mean.. if 2 branches have so similar > name.. it might be wanted behavior to have very similar color... > LOL! That's a very interesting point. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/st

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > > maybe there should be a "minimum distance" between color values? But we > > can't know that without comparing against all existing values, which is > > of course too much effort. > > > I have no idea what the current algorithm is > 40

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > On 8/26/2011 2:58 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > * branch-3.7.2 → #9abda6 > > * branch-3.7.4 → #99bca5 > > These really are too close--only 1 away in each of RGB so that the first > is just an indiscernible smidgen lighter than the second. >

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Joshua Paine
On 8/26/2011 2:58 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > * branch-3.7.2 → #9abda6 > * branch-3.7.4 → #99bca5 These really are too close--only 1 away in each of RGB so that the first is just an indiscernible smidgen lighter than the second. > maybe there should be a "minimum distance" between color values

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > release to merge that branch into trunk. But "symlinks" and "trunk" are > pretty close to one another, so active use of "symlinks" is nearly as good > as active use of "trunk". > Updating now, and i'm using fossil heavily tonight, so i'll p

[fossil-users] Testing for a release

2011-08-26 Thread Richard Hipp
It's been a long time since there has been an official release of Fossil. Probably I should do another soon To that end, I'm asking folks to please test the trunk. I use the trunk routinely, so it should be stable. But the more eyes the better. I say I'm using the trunk - actually I'm curre

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Tomek Kott
Do you mean a list of all files that have ever been deleted throughout the repository? Or a list of the files deleted in the last commit? I don't think there's a way to get the first. For the second, I would issue first "fossil timeline" to get the id of the last commit ID, then issue "fossil arti

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:04:42 +0200, Gilles wrote: > How do I get the list of files that have been deleted? It can be found through "fossil ui" > Branches > trunk, and clicking on the artifact where the file was deleted. Is there a CLI equivalent? ___

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:23:18 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: >Yes, it's possible to access all the versions up until the user ran >"delete" -- that's how all VCSes work. Thank you. How do I get the list of files that have been deleted? "It can initially be confusing to see a file that's been

Re: [fossil-users] Spam marks on this list e-mail messages

2011-08-26 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Aug 26, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > That 67.18.92.124 address resolves to sqlite.org, so I wonder if it's > possible to somehow contact spamhaus.org admins for this address to be > removed--it seems unlikely that this domain was used to send spam. It is not only possible,

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.18 Bug: 'update -n' does not work for merged files

2011-08-26 Thread Martin S. Weber
On 08/25/11 20:39, Marty Backe wrote: > If I want to see what files might change with an 'update', I supply the > '-n' option. E.g. fossil update -n > > For files that have a merge conflict, the 'baseline', 'original', and > 'merge' files get created on my local file system. All other files that >

[fossil-users] Spam marks on this list e-mail messages

2011-08-26 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
All messages I receive from this list since some time ago have the "[SPAM]" tag in the subject, and the headers typically contain this: X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:39:42 +0200 Gilles wrote: > I'm not clear about how "delete" works: It looks like it's a > way to tell Fossil to stop versioning a given file, ie. the opposite > of "add". > > The online help says that this command does not remove the files from > the disk but... doe

Re: [fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Tomek Kott
> The online help says that this command does not remove the files from > the disk but... does it remove it from the repo, or is it still > possible to access all the versions up until the user ran "delete"? > > It only removes the file from the repo from the point of the "delete" command on. So, a

[fossil-users] "delete": Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Gilles
Hello, I'm not clear about how "delete" works: It looks like it's a way to tell Fossil to stop versioning a given file, ie. the opposite of "add". The online help says that this command does not remove the files from the disk but... does it remove it from the repo, or is it still possible

Re: [fossil-users] Broken when checkout on root filesystem (/)

2011-08-26 Thread Martin Gagnon
I've made a bisect for on part of the problem. (for the "fossil: file outside of checkout tree" error when doing "fossil diff etc/fstab" on the exemple of my original post. I found that before this change, it was working: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/fdiff?v1=d5c8419ca0c1887f&v2=04be4540a