Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:34:06PM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Erlis Vidal wrote: > > > You shun a commit or a file in a commit? Is in fossil the shun generating a > > different commit? > > > > you can delete with git files that has history with > > > > git filter-b

Re: [fossil-users] Listing artifact IDs for shunning?

2011-10-05 Thread Eric
On Wed, October 5, 2011 6:14 am, Matt Welland wrote: ... > Every time pragmatism loses to philosophy someone, somewhere, is gonna get > screwed. But "pragmatic" decisions made by someone who doesn't understand the philosophy/principles/rules can also cause problems, > > It is noble to have a phi

Re: [fossil-users] Specifying files on the command line

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:12:49PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > There is a fossil-dev mailing list now. I added it to this thread - to see > if it actually works. Assuming the new mailing list does work, we should > try to move these kinds of discussions there, to minimize the noise for > people

Re: [fossil-users] Listing artifact IDs for shunning?

2011-10-05 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/05/2011 08:19 AM, Eric wrote: > Not altogether a bad idea but, as you might expect, I would worry about how > to select the time interval, and I think the system should insist on > keeping a comment about the deletion. Perhaps shuns should be p

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

2011-10-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Gé Weijers writes: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: >> Is there no way to make it switchable at runtime (like via `fossil set >> ipv6 on`) or is it doable but just complicated to implement? >> Having a compile-time switch effectively doubles the number of binaries >> one have to

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

2011-10-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Lluís Batlle i Rossell writes: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:58:08AM -0700, Gé Weijers wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: >> >> >Additionally, I don't know how portable it is to use always getaddrinfo >> >(POSIX-2001?) while requiring C89. >> >> C89 does not addres

[fossil-users] Shunning for testing

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, if I shun any contents from a repository, and rebuild... can I later 'unshun' them, and then expect a 'pull' to get them from whatever repository containing them? Regards, Lluís ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http

Re: [fossil-users] Shunning for testing

2011-10-05 Thread Richard Hipp
2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > Hello, > > if I shun any contents from a repository, and rebuild... can I later > 'unshun' > them, and then expect a 'pull' to get them from whatever repository > containing > them? > I can't think of a reason why that wouldn't work. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@s

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011-10-05 Thread Michal Suchanek
2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell : > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 02:34:06PM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Erlis Vidal wrote: >> >> > You shun a commit or a file in a commit? Is in fossil the shun generating a >> > different commit? >> > >> > you can delete with git files

Re: [fossil-users] Listing artifact IDs for shunning?

2011-10-05 Thread Steve Havelka
On 10/5/11 2:19 AM, Eric wrote: On Wed, October 5, 2011 6:14 am, Matt Welland wrote: ... Every time pragmatism loses to philosophy someone, somewhere, is gonna get screwed. But "pragmatic" decisions made by someone who doesn't understand the philosophy/principles/rules can also cause problems,

Re: [fossil-users] Listing artifact IDs for shunning?

2011-10-05 Thread Matt Welland
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Eric wrote: > > On Wed, October 5, 2011 6:14 am, Matt Welland wrote: > ... > > Every time pragmatism loses to philosophy someone, somewhere, is gonna > get > > screwed. > > But "pragmatic" decisions made by someone who doesn't understand the > philosophy/principle

[fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:06:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell : > > git looks to me as a tool for publishing development steps, not necessarily > > very > > related to the development history. The 'git version graph' is determined > > by the > > users the sam

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011-10-05 Thread Ron Wilson
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fortunately, there was still one other copy in the undo stack I would add a fourth lesson: Always backup your work. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fo

Re: [fossil-users] SSL: cannot connect to host www.fossil-scm.org:443

2011-10-05 Thread Jiří Navrátil
Thank you very much. Based on your input, I used fossil remote-url to switch from port 443 to 80. Now I can sync. I will go back to port 443, when signed certificate will be available. I will report then result then. Thank you, Jiri -- Jiri Navratil 4. 10. 2011 v 20:24, Konstantin Khomoutov:

Re: [fossil-users] [vb.net] Which files/folders can be safely ignored?

2011-10-05 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:14:56 +0200, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: >I don't know a lot about Visual Studio, but*.sln looks to me like a solution >file, don't ignore it. > >According to the git ignore template here >https://github.com/github/gitignore/blob/master/VB.Net.gitignore, >*.user and *.suo are s

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:24:30 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: [...] > > And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in > > your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your > > branch if you append the fix to the commit where it belongs > > logically or if you

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

2011-10-05 Thread Gé Weijers
Hi Ashish, On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: I wasn't aware of both sockaddr_storage, and getnameinfo(). They seem good to me, and I've updated diff[1] to use them. References: [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/fossil-ipv6-rev-proxy.diff A few comments (not all about your code):

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Meyer
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical > case of the famous "Blub paradox". > I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to > rewrite history and anoth

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov > wrote: >> >> That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical >> case of the famous "Blub paradox". >> I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to >> rewr

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:12:31 -0700 Mike Meyer wrote: > > That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a > > typical case of the famous "Blub paradox". > > I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to > > rewrite history and another one which doesn't, the first on

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Meyer
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov > > wrote: > >> > >> That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical > >> case of the famous "Blub paradox". > >> I

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Erlis Vidal
I get the two points of view and I'm not saying one is right or wrong. Modifying the history versus keeping everything as indeed happens (the history after all) Yesterday I was confused because I though the shun was done in the big file, but indeed the shun was done in the commit also... will that

[fossil-users] Where is my deleted file in the timeline?

2011-10-05 Thread Jos Groot Lipman
I had a file in my project that was no longer needed so I deleted the file on my disk. Next I did: fossil delete ViewLogAll.php fossil commit The feedback showed (among others) # DELETED ViewLogAll.php Next I start the Fossil gui. Under 'Files' myfilename.txt is no longer shown but when I pr

[fossil-users] fossil should know to open up perms on a file prior to update if no write access.

2011-10-05 Thread Matt Welland
Here is the sequence of events. A developer accidentally (and naively) checked in a file with no write permissions. On changing the file and checking it in others could not do an update and would get something like this: > fossil update UPDATE foo.txt fossil: unable to open file "/tmp/mrwellan/t

Re: [fossil-users] fossil should know to open up perms on a file prior to update if no write access.

2011-10-05 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
> A developer accidentally (and naively) checked in a file with no write > permissions. > > On changing the file and checking it in others could not do an update and > would get something like this: > > > fossil update > UPDATE foo.txt > fossil: unable to open file "/tmp/mrwellan/testing/test/f

Re: [fossil-users] fossil should know to open up perms on a file prior to update if no write access.

2011-10-05 Thread Matt Welland
My description was a bit off. The developer who initially checked in the file without write permission is the one who cannot do the update. The problem is not that fossil is storing or handling the perms wrong. The issue is that a controlled file with no write permission causes fossil to barf on an

Re: [fossil-users] Where is my deleted file in the timeline?

2011-10-05 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Jos Groot Lipman wrote: > ** > I had a file in my project that was no longer needed so I deleted the file > on my disk. > > Only the original checkin is shown. There is no indication when or where > the file was deleted. Should that not be in de file's history? > >

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011-10-05 Thread Gé Weijers
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Michal Suchanek wrote: And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your branch if you append the fix to the commit where it belongs logically or if you append it at the top of the history int

[fossil-users] GUI client for Windows?

2011-10-05 Thread Gilles
Hello I'd like to use a fat GUI client instead of the CLI or the web UI, so checked out GUI clients for Windows. Since I can't stand Java, I didn't try jurassic-fossil. Apparently, the only alternative for Windows is Ingo Koch's WinFossil. http://repository.mobile-developers.de/cgi-bin/ikoch/sh

Re: [fossil-users] SSL: cannot connect to host www.fossil-scm.org:443

2011-10-05 Thread Richard Hipp
2011/10/5 Jiří Navrátil > Thank you very much. > > Based on your input, I used fossil remote-url to switch from port 443 to > 80. Now I can sync. > > I will go back to port 443, when signed certificate will be available. I > will report then result then. > Please try it now and let me know how i

Re: [fossil-users] SSL: cannot connect to host www.fossil-scm.org:443

2011-10-05 Thread Jiri Navratil
I'm back to port 443. I have to accept "Unknown SSL certificate". Sync is working. Is Fingerprint all right? Accept always not save me before the same questions. I have to find, how to avoid this "WARNING: Certificate doesn't match the saved certificate for this host!" probably. Thank you, Jiri

Re: [fossil-users] fossil: out of memory

2011-10-05 Thread Jiri Navratil
I upgraded to This is fossil version 1.19 [080d27a6b2] 2011-10-05 08:00:00 UTC Not sure, what I shall do in gdb. So I have this. Please let me know, what next I can trace. Sorry fossil(2681) malloc: *** mmap(size=18446744067267100672) failed (error code=12) *** error: can't allocate region **

Re: [fossil-users] Where is my deleted file in the timeline?

2011-10-05 Thread Jos Groot Lipman
Indeed, with 1.19 the problem is solved after a rebuild. Thanks. Jos _ From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Richard Hipp Sent: donderdag 6 oktober 2011 2:38 To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fos