On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Cunningham, Robert
rcunning...@nsmsurveillance.com wrote:
I had started thinking along similar lines, and I just realized that git
seems to be becoming a vital utility for Fossil. The export/import cycle
appears to be useful in multiple scenarios encountered
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:01:34PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell
vi...@viric.namewrote:
in a save operation. Can you reproduce it?
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name
wrote:
in a save operation.
Hello, all,
Last night i started jotting down ideas about what a custom page feature
might look like, and found out very quickly that the devil is in the
details.
There are several different approaches to consider, not necessarily
mutually exclusive:
1) The pages/commands are added via
Stephan Beal wrote:
If TH1 is not powerful enough for this case (i don't know if it is or
isn't,
or if it is easy enough to extend), the next obvious choice would be the
TCL
support (which is, AFAIK, still living in its own branch?).
It's in trunk; however, the compile-time define
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.comwrote:
Additionally, it must be enabled at runtime by setting the tcl option for
the repository to true.
Thanks, Joe.
Could we all (or most of us) agree that TCL would be a reasonable
prerequisite for those wanting
Stephan Beal wrote:
Could we all (or most of us) agree that TCL would be a reasonable
prerequisite
for those wanting server-side scriptable/templatized custom pages? i.e.
would
it be a bad idea for me to look at this option in more detail?
Speaking for myself, I completely agree
6 matches
Mail list logo
