At the risk of going off topic and for what it's worth I generally use a
mind-mapping package for managing most of my projects (both personally and
professionally). It allows the design to be mapped out to any degree of detail
that I like and decent one allows notes to be added to each item and
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
From the startup side - with like 3 people on the project the
contribution of some software for project organization is questionable
at best. The overall attitude is geared towards doing stuff,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2012 10:46 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote:
On 08/03/12 15:42, Stephan Beal wrote:
[---]
Another consideration here is that the wiki has kind of fallen out of use,
[---]
I don't know that that is true. The only proof of this I have seen
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com wrote:
Fossil is almost but not quite such a wiki. It has built in wiki that
is not versioned,
The built-in wiki is versioned. The interface is such that it does not
show the version DAG, however, and there are no provisions
On 8/6/2012 8:57 AM, David Given wrote:
I would like to run Fossil for a project on Sourceforge. This would live
inside the project's CGI space.
Unfortunately Sourceforge doesn't support SSL for project websites. This
means that all Fossil communications would be in the clear. This isn't a
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.ukwrote:
I have a fossil repo for my house. The wiki is served up from the home...
i'm willing to bet that that's a use case none of us foresaw.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
I believe Fossil sends passwords in clear text, right now, but it would be
possible to change it to use a challenge handshake -- I don't know the
details of the protocol, but maybe there's a provision for using alternate
protocol versions, so that fossil server could support both types of
Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
My personal observation has been that even with a tiny group, an email
containing a list of action items very quickly yields a thread of dozens, or
hundreds of follow-ups - requests for details,
On 7 August 2012 20:10, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
My personal observation has been that even with a tiny group, an email
containing a list of action items very quickly
[[
Get your papers, WIPs and posters in.
(We have an exhibition hall with 25 gesture-controlled screens to
show the latter two on).
The deadline for abstracts and proposals is
three weeks away.
]]
[[ Notes:
Colin Walker of F5 is confirmed as our Keynote speaker.
10 matches
Mail list logo
