On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:59:59 -0600
"C. Thomas Stover" wrote:
> Is there some way to push just a specific branch to a server other
> than the private branch feature?
No, but it was discussed in the past...btw, I'd also like to have
selective push/pull feature.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
He who is re
Is there some way to push just a specific branch to a server other than
the private branch feature? For example branch A and B are both stored
locally, and are both pushed to server 1, yet only branch B is pushed
to server 2.
___
fossil-users mailing lis
On 12/11/12 23:08, K wrote:
> I agree with Themba. I like that Fossil is a separate repo 'world' from my
> files. If this boundary is to be pierced, I think it should require passing
> in some kind of explicit switch to cause it. eg., ./fossil -s rm ..., s in
> this example representing "sync".
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:50:06 +0100, Themba Fletcher
wrote:
Sorry to drag up an old thread, but I'm just checking back in after a
lengthy absence.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Nolan Darilek
wrote:
Weighing in on this, finally:
It's interesting to me that everyone speculates that this
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:08 PM, K wrote:
> I agree with Themba. I like that Fossil is a separate repo 'world' from my
> files. If this boundary is to be pierced, I think it should require passing
> in some kind of explicit switch to cause it. eg., ./fossil -s rm ..., s in
> this example represen
I agree with Themba. I like that Fossil is a separate repo 'world' from my
files. If this boundary is to be pierced, I think it should require passing in
some kind of explicit switch to cause it. eg., ./fossil -s rm ..., s in this
example representing "sync".
I would like some friendly tip text
Sorry to drag up an old thread, but I'm just checking back in after a
lengthy absence.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Nolan Darilek wrote:
> Weighing in on this, finally:
>
> It's interesting to me that everyone speculates that this *might* break
> things for some hypothetical person, and *migh
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:58:41 +0100, Marc Simpson wrote:
Thanks Joerg,
I've just pushed a fix -- can you try it out and let me know whether it
resolves the issue
yes it does. thanks.
j.
Best,
Marc
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM, j. v. d. hoff
wrote:
thanks for this script which
Thanks Joerg,
I've just pushed a fix -- can you try it out and let me know whether it
resolves the issue?
Best,
Marc
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:51 PM, j. v. d. hoff wrote:
> thanks for this script which looks promising.
> first bug report: I see interference with the `nano' editor (which is set
thanks for this script which looks promising.
first bug report: I see interference with the `nano' editor (which is set
as my 'checkin editor' due to its low latency): `nano' is keyboard driven
and uses the command `^X' (CNTRL-X) for "save and exit". when using `fsl
ci' the editor opens all
Hi all,
I've recently written a simple wrapper for Fossil with the goal of
providing an improved CLI experience and thought others might find it
useful.
The script is written in Tcl/Expect and provides the following features:
* Command aliasing
* Output filtering
* A number of preconfig
11 matches
Mail list logo
