Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-03 Thread Nico Williams
On Jan 3, 2013 12:13 PM, "Richard Hipp" @ sqlite.org > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym > @snell- pym.org.uk > wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 12/31/2012 09:33 AM, Nico Williams wrote: >> >> > I'm very glad you mentioned this.

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-03 Thread Gour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:12:53 -0500 Richard Hipp wrote: > If I understand you correctly, I believe this is what happens if you > do your lots of tiny commits into a --private branch, then merge that > private branch into trunk (or some other public br

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-03 Thread Ramon Ribó
Hello, In my opinion, the private branch concept only works well for people working in just one computer. In the every day more common case of people developing in several computers (desktop, laptop, tablet, etc), private branches do not adapt well to the situation. Probably the solution could be

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/31/2012 09:33 AM, Nico Williams wrote: > > > I'm very glad you mentioned this. I really would like git rebase (and > > any equivalents in other VCSes) to add an empty commit whose

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Git/Mercurial/etc.?

2013-01-03 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/31/2012 09:33 AM, Nico Williams wrote: > I'm very glad you mentioned this. I really would like git rebase (and > any equivalents in other VCSes) to add an empty commit whose message > contains: the old base commit hash, the new base commit has,