On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
You might want to scan through the open tickets looking for issues that
would impact your intended usage and then either test the latest fossil
against those issues or ask on the list specifically about it.
+1
We don't
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
You might want to scan through the open tickets looking for issues that
would impact your intended usage and then either test the latest fossil
2013/7/4 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com:
Well, when I did this commit:
http://core.tcl.tk/itcl/info/0805477fbf
what I did was a fossil commit . while the current directory
was generic. So, why was Makefile.in committed then?
Found the bug:
OK, sounds good, but it would be great it someone who Has A Clue
(unfortunately not me at this point) could go through those old
tickets and clean them up - i.e. close them as fixed, duplicates, or
will-not-implement. Call it project hygiene - make the project look a
lot more professional.
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:57 PM, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote:
OK, sounds good, but it would be great it someone who Has A Clue
(unfortunately not me at this point) could go through those old
tickets and clean them up - i.e. close them as fixed, duplicates, or
will-not-implement. Call
Hi all,
I've committed a pretty big changeto the diff
code(http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/4081a91c84) , and I'd
like some other people to take a look at it/test it out before it
(maybe/hopefully) gets merged into the trunk.
The purpose of this commit is, as the commit message
6 matches
Mail list logo
