Re: [fossil-users] Diff doesn't appear correct with incremental import

2013-07-15 Thread Sean Woods
> The problem with incremental imports is the SHA1 hash mapping between > git and Fossil: in the pure content case (blobs) they may be the same, > but the correspondence between git commits and manifest artifacts is not > currently saved anywhere. I don't think it should be too much difficult > t

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
On 7/15/13, Martin Gagnon wrote: > Le 15 juil. 2013 18:21, "B Harder" a écrit : >> >> Is there a: >> >> $ fossil co initial_ci >> >> Command/workalike available, or am I left to: >> >> $ fossil timel -n | tail >> [copy SHA1] >> $ fossil co [paste SHA1] >> >> ? > > You can tag the initia

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 03:21:54PM -0700, B Harder wrote: > Is there a: > > $ fossil co initial_ci > > Command/workalike available, or am I left to: > > $ fossil timel -n | tail > [copy SHA1] > $ fossil co [paste SHA1] > > ? > > -bch > I got it.. what you want is: fossil up ro

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread Martin Gagnon
Le 15 juil. 2013 18:21, "B Harder" a écrit : > > Is there a: > > $ fossil co initial_ci > > Command/workalike available, or am I left to: > > $ fossil timel -n | tail > [copy SHA1] > $ fossil co [paste SHA1] > > ? You can tag the initial commit if it's important for you. So you just hav

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
** s/don't want to remain pure/want to remain pure/. On 7/15/13, B Harder wrote: > On 7/15/13, Stephan Beal wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:21 AM, B Harder wrote: >> >>> Is there a: >>> >>> $ fossil co initial_ci >>> >>> Command/workalike available, or am I left to: >>> >>> $ fossil timel

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
On 7/15/13, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:21 AM, B Harder wrote: > >> Is there a: >> >> $ fossil co initial_ci >> >> Command/workalike available, or am I left to: >> >> $ fossil timel -n | tail >> [copy SHA1] >> $ fossil co [paste SHA1] >> > > There is a way to do it

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > === 2007-07-21 === > 14:10:57 [dbda8d6ce9] Initial check-in of m1 sources. (user: drh tags: > trunk) > 14:09:59 [a28c83647d] initial empty baseline (user: drh tags: trunk) > PS: fossil turns 6 next week! -- - stephan beal http://wande

Re: [fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:21 AM, B Harder wrote: > Is there a: > > $ fossil co initial_ci > > Command/workalike available, or am I left to: > > $ fossil timel -n | tail > [copy SHA1] > $ fossil co [paste SHA1] > There is a way to do it but you have to know the timeframe when the repo

[fossil-users] Alias for first initial empty checkin?

2013-07-15 Thread B Harder
Is there a: $ fossil co initial_ci Command/workalike available, or am I left to: $ fossil timel -n | tail [copy SHA1] $ fossil co [paste SHA1] ? -bch -- Brad Harder Method Logic Digital Consulting http://twitter.com/bcharder ___ fossil-us

Re: [fossil-users] Diff doesn't appear correct with incremental import

2013-07-15 Thread Isaac Jurado
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sean Woods wrote: > >> This all works fine, with one significant exception. When I do a >> diff operation on many files that are updated during the incremental >> import, it appears that the entire file is "new." In other words, >> the left hand side of the diff

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Matt Welland wrote: >> >>> ...know to just try again on the occasional update fail due to a busy >>> fossil. A more graceful fail or better yet a wa

Re: [fossil-users] Ssh and multiple users on the same ssh account

2013-07-15 Thread Rene
On 2013-07-15 02:34, David Mason wrote: You might want to look at how mercurial-server works. You set up one remote account that owns the master repository, but then everyone can access e.g. ssh://h...@foo.bar/reponame but each key has a command set up that says who it is that's accessing and th

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Matt Welland
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> ...know to just try again on the occasional update fail due to a busy >> fossil. A more graceful fail or better yet a wait and retry would be nice >> but recovery is as simple as up-a

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > ...know to just try again on the occasional update fail due to a busy > fossil. A more graceful fail or better yet a wait and retry would be nice > but recovery is as simple as up-arrow, enter. > i've been bitten by NFS-related deficiencies

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Matt Welland
I don't think NFS should be a problem. I am involved in an installation using fossil on NFS with over 300 fossils synced between 3 sites. Some 300 users have access but I'm not sure how many are actively accessing the repos. All fossils are accessed via NFS so collisions happen all the time. People

Re: [fossil-users] Diff doesn't appear correct with incremental import

2013-07-15 Thread Sean Woods
> This all works fine, with one significant exception. When I do a diff > operation on many files that are updated during the incremental import, it > appears that the entire file is "new." In other words, the left hand side of > the diff is blank and the right hand side is entirely green. If

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Mohd Radzi Ibrahim wrote: > After update to the latest (I think it was one month ago or so), I run > "fossil all rebuild" while the fossil daemon is running. > > 1. fossil update > 2. make; sudo make install > 3. fossil all rebuild > > I'm not sure what the "fossi

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> Hi, all, >> >> i have just installed a fossil repo on a company-internal Linux server >> and i am seeing a weird new error message at the top of all pages: >> >> error code 28: fil

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Mohd Radzi Ibrahim
On Jul 15, 2013 8:17 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Mohd Radzi Ibrahim wrote: >> >> I have similar issue. It was running on Ubuntu local folder. I run "all rebuild" while the server still running. From there on I got the same message on the web interface. How d

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Mohd Radzi Ibrahim wrote: > I have similar issue. It was running on Ubuntu local folder. I run "all > rebuild" while the server still running. From there on I got the same > message on the web interface. How do we fix this? > Can you describe how to reproduce the p

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Mohd Radzi Ibrahim
I have similar issue. It was running on Ubuntu local folder. I run "all rebuild" while the server still running. From there on I got the same message on the web interface. How do we fix this? Thanks. On Jul 15, 2013 8:09 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Stephan Be

Re: [fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Hi, all, > > i have just installed a fossil repo on a company-internal Linux server and > i am seeing a weird new error message at the top of all pages: > > error code 28: file renamed while open: /.../bss-scripts.fsl > This is a warning mes

Re: [fossil-users] Hierarchical tags in Embedded Documentation

2013-07-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:37 PM, ST wrote: > Hi, > > is there anything new on this? > Nope, but please don't take that personally. Feature requests are only implemented as time, energy, and desire of the developer(s) allow(s). Patches are of course welcomed :). -- - stephan beal http://wan

[fossil-users] "file renamed while open"

2013-07-15 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, i have just installed a fossil repo on a company-internal Linux server and i am seeing a weird new error message at the top of all pages: error code 28: file renamed while open: /.../bss-scripts.fsl It turns out that i am on an NFS (didn't know that until just now), and i know that NFS

[fossil-users] Hierarchical tags in Embedded Documentation

2013-07-15 Thread ST
Hi, is there anything new on this? > is it possible to mark embedded documentation pages with hierarchical > tags, like - "fruit", "banana" and then list all pages that belong to > the tags? > > If such feature is not present - may I ask to implement it? Thank you. ST