Thus said Matt Welland on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:16:42 -0700:
> The ssh key is being used to give access only to the fossil file and
> yes, the access list would map ssh keys (thus users) to fossils.
Just for clarification... access list would map an SSH key user
to fossils, but not n
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Andy Bradford <
amb-sendok-1377061791.goefgfndahogdhegp...@bradfords.org> wrote:
> Notice that I'm able to access multiple fossil files with my SSH key and
> Fossil account. And, I can install as many SSH keys into the ``guest''
> account as I like.
>
>
> > This
Thus said Matt Welland on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 12:33:18 -0700:
> I think the ultimate usage I envision might be super-set of what Andy
> is describing but I'm not sure. Would the proposed mechanism enable
> the usage model I describe below?
What you described has additional ``features'' tha
Hi Stephan,
What you propose sounds like the SQLite model where the core is a lib, and the
part we SCM users interact with is the CLI (or HTTP). From a user's
standpoint, I'd like to assume the project would provide the "default"
executable, equivalent to today's fossil executable.
Overall,
My wishlist:
1. Full-text search through the file contents and history. Search this list
for "howto `grep' through old revisions" to see some ideas (mine is at the
end of that thread), but some other ideas could work great, too.
2. Partial pulls - I mean that if pulling from a large repository, an
W dniu 2013-07-21 16:19, MaxJarek pisze:
Hi.
I have rproxy configuration for fossil. At the front rproxy has HTTPS but
internaly use HTTP for
fossil connection.
HTTP only configuration works fine but with HTTPS not. Fossil still returns
http://... instead https://
I found excellent conversat
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:
[snip]
> I'm trying to accomplish what I believe Matt Welland was suggesting it
> do, which I did like. Basically, if I have an SSH account named
> ``fossil'' on my server, I can use it to server out as many fossils as I
> like to
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> a) Creation of graphs to show statistics.
>
> I'm on it now, writing a minimal png with 32bit ARGB color and a minimal
> graph lib.
>
Added to the list.
> b) Plugins and hooks c modules
>
> I use fossil with a central fossil reposito
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> I have no objections. I suggest you want a few days and if you get no
> other replies, then make the change.
>
Sounds good to me.
> Seems like there ought to be a hyperlink to the /stats_report page (or
> whatever its new name will be).
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> ... to /reports?
>
> the name /stats_report just seems cumbersome to me.
>
I have no objections. I suggest you want a few days and if you get no
other replies, then make the change.
Seems like there ought to be a hyperlink to the /stats_re
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 12:54:05 +0200
Stephan Beal wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> This topic has been tossed around before, but the amount of effort involved
> in its undertaking has always kept us from actually doing it...
>
> To help bootstrap the process of figuring out what Fossil v2 might look
> like
... to /reports?
the name /stats_report just seems cumbersome to me.
:-?
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8
Hi.
I have rproxy configuration for fossil. At the front rproxy has HTTPS but internaly use HTTP for
fossil connection.
HTTP only configuration works fine but with HTTPS not. Fossil still returns
http://... instead https://
I found excellent conversation at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/foss
Hi, all,
This topic has been tossed around before, but the amount of effort involved
in its undertaking has always kept us from actually doing it...
To help bootstrap the process of figuring out what Fossil v2 might look
like i have started writing down ideas in a public Google Doc:
https://docs
14 matches
Mail list logo
