Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:56:54 +0300: > * Failures: ... th1-setting-5 th1-setting-6 These two failures appear to be happening because they expect to find a setting (autosync == 1), but find something else. I believe this is because they operate on the current

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:25:04PM +0100, Jan Nijtmans wrote: [snip] > I compiled/ran it on Cygwin64, and "make test" ended with: > * Final result: 2 errors out of 18914 tests > * Failures: merge-utf-24-23 merge-utf-24-32 > [snip] Same thing here on OpenBSD 5.3 amd64... I've al

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

../configure --quiet&&make -s test|sed -ne '/Final result:/,$p' Cannot run this test within an open checkout Cannot run this test within an open checkout Cannot run this test within an open checkout * Final result: 2 errors out of 18915 tests * Failures: merge-utf-24-23 merge-ut

Re: [fossil-users] 1.28 vdiff changes

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:37:40AM -0500, Martin Gagnon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:28:18PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:24:12AM -0500, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:19:19PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > > > Hello, >

Re: [fossil-users] 1.28 vdiff changes

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:28:18PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:24:12AM -0500, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:19:19PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > the Changes page says for 1.28: > > > - Enhancements to the

Re: [fossil-users] 1.28 vdiff changes

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:24:12AM -0500, Martin Gagnon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:19:19PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the Changes page says for 1.28: > > - Enhancements to the "/vdiff" webpage for more difference display options. > > > > But what I see, is t

Re: [fossil-users] 1.28 vdiff changes

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:19:19PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > Hello, > > the Changes page says for 1.28: > - Enhancements to the "/vdiff" webpage for more difference display options. > > But what I see, is that it lost the 'Patch' option. > > What are exactly the additional display

[fossil-users] 1.28 vdiff changes

Hello, the Changes page says for 1.28: - Enhancements to the "/vdiff" webpage for more difference display options. But what I see, is that it lost the 'Patch' option. What are exactly the additional display options? Thank you, Lluís ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

On Jan 10, 2014, at 15:29 , Richard Hipp wrote: > Thank you. But those antique test cases don't really matter that much. > (The test failures you are seeing are likely due to problems in the tests > themselves, not problems in Fossil, though we will verify this prior to > release.) Well, an err

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

Thank you. But those antique test cases don't really matter that much. (The test failures you are seeing are likely due to problems in the tests themselves, not problems in Fossil, though we will verify this prior to release.) I'm really interested in knowing whether or not the latest Fossil is w

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

On Jan 10, 2014, at 13:30 , Michai Ramakers wrote: > * End of utf: 2 errors so far ** > * Final result: 2 errors out of 18915 tests > * Failures: merge-utf-24-23 merge-utf-24-32 The same tests are failing on my machine: $ uname -a Darwin pc6.home 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

On 10 January 2014 13:25, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >>Everybody: Please download, compile, and test the branch above. If there >>are no issues reported, it will become the official 1.28 release. > > for my info, when you say 'pleas

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > >Everybody: Please download, compile, and test the branch above. If there >are no issues reported, it will become the official 1.28 release. for my info, when you say 'please test', do you mean 'run the test-suite from the build a

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

more info: test-out @ http://phaeton.sdf-eu.org/fossil-1f10199a09724a50-test-out -M ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014/1/10 Mark Janssen : > > Sorry to keep replying to myself, but with latest version of > > delay-ticket-hook [e4af590ff9] it still doesn't work. > > The cause is that in tkt.c the result logic is off. Below change fixes > it: > > Yes, that

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > > > 2014/1/9 Richard Hipp : > > > Jan - would you like to start the "branch-1.28" containing the SQLite > > 3.8.2 > > > release? > > > >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil cut first charracter of the filename

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 09:58:33AM +0200, Andrey Shtine wrote: > Hello, > > >Perhaps having fossil manage files outside its own root is not > >practical to implement/want, I don't know. > > > >And can be very confusing and dangerous. > I suppose, in that case instead of this reaction: > >if I chan

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

2014/1/10 Mark Janssen : > Sorry to keep replying to myself, but with latest version of > delay-ticket-hook [e4af590ff9] it still doesn't work. > The cause is that in tkt.c the result logic is off. Below change fixes it: Yes, that's it! I saw Joe's fixes, but I still wasn't sure if that was enough

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> >>> 2014/1/9 Jan Nijtmans : >>> > I have a different fix >>> > in mind, I'll come back on that later. >>> >>>

Re: [fossil-users] Using Markdown for tickets and in TH1

On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:24:10 +0100 Mark Janssen wrote: Hi Mark, > 1) Add a [markdown ] TH1 command to allow access to the included > markdown parser from TH1 > 2) Slightly tweaked the markdown parser to not produce a pair > for strings with at most one newline > 3) Changed the default ticket