I'm using fossil with eclipse based project where .dotfiles are required to
be source controlled. I'm aware of --dotfiles option but I forget to use
that sometimes.
Is there any way by which I can ask fossil assume --dotfiles for all
applicable commands?
A project specific setting would be great.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Dömötör Gulyás wrote:
> On 1 June 2014 06:43, B Harder wrote:
>> http://mikegerwitz.com/papers/git-horror-story
>
> An interesting scenario, what is there to be learned from it for
> fossil? Since fossil doesn't like history rewrites, are we protected
> to some deg
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Scott Robison
> wrote:
>
>> DOH! Ah well, usually it was S-Q-L. :)
>>
>
> To be fair, though, he only did it (once) in the context of the MS product
> named SQL Server, and if i'm not mistaken that how MS sa
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Scott Robison
wrote:
> DOH! Ah well, usually it was S-Q-L. :)
>
To be fair, though, he only did it (once) in the context of the MS product
named SQL Server, and if i'm not mistaken that how MS says it.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan
DOH! Ah well, usually it was S-Q-L. :)
On Jun 2, 2014 10:00 AM, "Stephan Beal" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Scott Robison
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for sharing that. And it was good to hear an entire presentation
>> about SQL without once (that I can recall) hearing it pronounced "sequel"
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Scott Robison
wrote:
> Thanks for sharing that. And it was good to hear an entire presentation
> about SQL without once (that I can recall) hearing it pronounced "sequel".
> :)
>
Sorry, Scott: @ 4:41s
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan
Great talk! And now I'm thinking about applications of SQLite...
I added a reference to Fossil in the comments.
../Dave
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-user
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Baruch Burstein
wrote:
> At 28:18 drh suggests that key/value pair engines will not stand the test
> of time. Isn't sqlite4 going to be a key/value engine?
>
>
Every SQL database engine has a key/value storage engine underneath. The
point is not the underlying sto
At 28:18 drh suggests that key/value pair engines will not stand the test
of time. Isn't sqlite4 going to be a key/value engine?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> Thus said B Harder on Sun, 01 Jun 2014 22:42:39 -0700:
>
> > I think drh unnecessarily missed an opportunity
2014-05-30 22:25 GMT+02:00 Stephan Beal :
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Stephan Beal
> wrote:
> H. It seems fossil no longer has an option to create the initial
> checkin, and i can't figure out how to create one without libfossil:
There are currently 3 ways to create a repository with
10 matches
Mail list logo
