Re: [fossil-users] Unusual timeline

2014-07-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:49:45 -0500: > What's going on here? Everything is tagged trunk, yet [b4a53ba45f] is > displayed as if on a branch. Was there a fork or something? As Richard already explained it was a fork. For a good explanation of a fork (which is really just like

Re: [fossil-users] Unusual timeline

2014-07-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?p=92c2c1e5e18b19c5b05ea5684feb0bbeeb6670fd > > What's going on here? Everything is tagged trunk, yet [b4a53ba45f] is > displayed as if on a branch.

Re: [fossil-users] Time stamps

2014-07-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Philip Bennefall wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a bunch of commits that were made while the time zone on the > machine was set incorrectly. If I change the time zone, will the timeline > items be displayed in the new zone or will they remain as is? If the > latter, is

[fossil-users] /info/ versus /ci?name=

2014-07-09 Thread Andy Goth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What is the difference between the /info/ and /ci?name= URLs? When followed by a check-in artifact ID or unambiguous prefix thereof, it seems the only difference is /ci?name= shows diffs and /info/ merely offers to show diffs. The problem I have is u

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Timothy Beyer
At Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:23:02 -0500, Andy Goth wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > In one project tree I have a symlink pointing to a directory outside > of the checkout directory. [fossil extras] lists all the files in the > referenced directory as extras even though t

[fossil-users] Fossil terminal I/O to custom terminal in Windows

2014-07-09 Thread Andy Goth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I wrote a simple custom terminal program demonstrating how to work with stdin/stdout/stdio, available on the Tcler's Wiki: http://wiki.tcl.tk/3543 . Right now I'm finding it to be useful on a system at work that halfheartedly hides cmd.exe in the name

Re: [fossil-users] Unusual timeline

2014-07-09 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?p=92c2c1e5e18b19c5b05ea5684feb0bbeeb6670fd > > What's going on here? Everything is tagged trunk, yet [b4a53ba45f] is > displayed as if on a branch. Was there a fork or something? > The only differenc

[fossil-users] Time stamps

2014-07-09 Thread Philip Bennefall
Hi all, I have a bunch of commits that were made while the time zone on the machine was set incorrectly. If I change the time zone, will the timeline items be displayed in the new zone or will they remain as is? If the latter, is there a way to modify the time stamps on all the commits? In th

[fossil-users] Unusual timeline

2014-07-09 Thread Andy Goth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?p=92c2c1e5e18b19c5b05ea5684feb0bbeeb6670fd What's going on here? Everything is tagged trunk, yet [b4a53ba45f] is displayed as if on a branch. Was there a fork or something? - -- Andy Goth | -BEGIN PGP

Re: [fossil-users] artifact by file name

2014-07-09 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Brian Tiffin wrote: > Now try > > /artifact?ci=CHECKIN&filename=PATH That worked. Thanks. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-

Re: [fossil-users] artifact by file name

2014-07-09 Thread Brian Tiffin
Ron W wrote: In the web UI, is there a way to fetch the artifact by the file name? Something like: /artifact?name=filename&ci=tag I think something like this has been answered on the list, but I wasn't successful searching for it. ___ fossil-us

Re: [fossil-users] A typo in Makefile.in

2014-07-09 Thread Sergei Gavrikov
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > Found the problem: _GNU_SOURCE needs to be defined > BEFORE inclusion of the first system header file. Yes, this fixed the issue. Thanks! Sergei ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org h

Re: [fossil-users] artifact by file name

2014-07-09 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Brian Tiffin wrote: > Ron W wrote: > >> In the web UI, is there a way to fetch the artifact by the file name? >> > > try > > fossil cat filename > I'm asking for the web UI equivalent of /artifact - s, instead of: http://host.domain/artifact/hash I want:

Re: [fossil-users] artifact by file name

2014-07-09 Thread Brian Tiffin
Ron W wrote: In the web UI, is there a way to fetch the artifact by the file name? Something like: /artifact?name=filename&ci=tag I think something like this has been answered on the list, but I wasn't successful searching for it. Ron, try fossil cat filename Cheers, Brian __

Re: [fossil-users] A typo in Makefile.in

2014-07-09 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-07-09 22:47 GMT+02:00 Jan Nijtmans : > 2014-07-09 22:43 GMT+02:00 Sergei Gavrikov : >> On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Jan Nijtmans wrote: >>> What compile error are you seeing? On what platform? > > Yes, I can indeed reproduce this on Linux. I moved the code > to the utime_usleep branch. Found the probl

Re: [fossil-users] A typo in Makefile.in

2014-07-09 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-07-09 22:43 GMT+02:00 Sergei Gavrikov : > On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> What compile error are you seeing? On what platform? Yes, I can indeed reproduce this on Linux. I moved the code to the utime_usleep branch. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans _

[fossil-users] artifact by file name

2014-07-09 Thread Ron W
In the web UI, is there a way to fetch the artifact by the file name? Something like: /artifact?name=filename&ci=tag I think something like this has been answered on the list, but I wasn't successful searching for it. ___ fossil-users mailing list fos

Re: [fossil-users] A typo in Makefile.in

2014-07-09 Thread Sergei Gavrikov
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014-07-09 22:11 GMT+02:00 Sergei Gavrikov : > > FYI: there is a typo in Makefile.in which does cause compile error > > > > > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/vpatch?from=df3ada575c9e3f0c&to=45feda65e9978b9e > > > > s/_HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H/HAVE_SQLITE

Re: [fossil-users] A typo in Makefile.in

2014-07-09 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-07-09 22:11 GMT+02:00 Sergei Gavrikov : > FYI: there is a typo in Makefile.in which does cause compile error > > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/vpatch?from=df3ada575c9e3f0c&to=45feda65e9978b9e > > s/_HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H/HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H/ (?) No, it's not a typo. This is meant to f

[fossil-users] A typo in Makefile.in

2014-07-09 Thread Sergei Gavrikov
FYI: there is a typo in Makefile.in which does cause compile error http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/vpatch?from=df3ada575c9e3f0c&to=45feda65e9978b9e s/_HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H/HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H/ (?) Sergei ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@

Re: [fossil-users] remote-url of repo points to itself somehow (did I do this?)

2014-07-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > actually... "it happened again", and the reason was simply me > forgetting the '-R' option for 'remote-url': e.g. typing "fossil > remote-url /the/local/repo.fossil" instead of "fossil remote-url -R > /the/local/repo.fossil". That will set

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > addremove perhaps? I've been afraid to experiment because I don't want > to jack up my repository. > Understood. Here's my analysis after implementing an "is in repo" algo, and i've found the core of the problem: canonicalizing a symink... [o

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Beal > wrote: > >> so everything for a fix is already in place :). Looking into 'clean' >> now... >> > > i don't believe clean is affected by this problem: > > if( file_tree_name(g.zRepositoryName,

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Andy Goth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/9/2014 2:29 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Andy Goth > wrote: >> I think symlink handling needs to be reevaluated. Symlinks to >> files and directories outside the checkout definitely need to not >> have the effect of

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > so everything for a fix is already in place :). Looking into 'clean' now... > i don't believe clean is affected by this problem: if( file_tree_name(g.zRepositoryName, &repo, 0) ){ db_multi_exec("DELETE FROM sfile WHERE x=%B", &repo

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Doh. Indeed. i'm looking into it now. i know we have a routine which > determines if a file is in the checkout (b/c i ported it to libf), but > can't remember what it's called. > Here we go: /* ** Compute a pathname for a file relative to th

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > According to the -n option, [fossil clean] would remove the files. > That's rather serious. > Doh. Indeed. i'm looking into it now. i know we have a routine which determines if a file is in the checkout (b/c i ported it to libf), but can't remem

[fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-09 Thread Andy Goth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In one project tree I have a symlink pointing to a directory outside of the checkout directory. [fossil extras] lists all the files in the referenced directory as extras even though they are not actually part of the checkout. I think they should be o