Re: [fossil-users] Stability of fossil test-name-to-id

2014-08-20 Thread org.fossil-scm.fossil-users
On 2014-08-20T14:51:30 -0400 Richard Hipp wrote: > > Probably test-name-to-id won't just go away. If you encounter problems, it > will likely be because we "enhance" the command to output additional > information, which then breaks your parsing logic. Or the command might be > promoted to a "su

Re: [fossil-users] available topologies for syncing and other misc questions

2014-08-20 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Charles Curtit wrote: > This thread is sort of complete from my POV so I wanted to say thanks. > It’s not that often I get so much good natured and usefull feedback on a > mailing list. > I think some of us here can thank you, too. Your scenario helps highlight

Re: [fossil-users] available topologies for syncing and other misc questions

2014-08-20 Thread Charles Curtit
Everybody, This thread is sort of complete from my POV so I wanted to say thanks. It’s not that often I get so much good natured and usefull feedback on a mailing list. Fossil may not fit my dream use case (because of realtime issues mostly) But I have a few other cases where it could fit well.

Re: [fossil-users] Stability of fossil test-name-to-id

2014-08-20 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Aha! ... i _thought_ we had an sqlite binding to that function, but > apparently we don't (libfossil does ;). i've added that to the todo list > (in the case that it really is missing), so you could so something like: > > echo "select sym2ri

Re: [fossil-users] Stability of fossil test-name-to-id

2014-08-20 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:44 PM, wrote: > > Am I to assume that test-name-to-id is definitely not to be depended > upon? > Probably test-name-to-id won't just go away. If you encounter problems, it will likely be because we "enhance" the command to output additional information, which then brea

Re: [fossil-users] Stability of fossil test-name-to-id

2014-08-20 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:44 PM, wrote: > I'm trying to stick to either calling the fossil binary directly, or > piping SQL into "fossil sqlite" in the worst case. > Aha! ... i _thought_ we had an sqlite binding to that function, but apparently we don't (libfossil does ;). i've added that to the

Re: [fossil-users] Stability of fossil test-name-to-id

2014-08-20 Thread org.fossil-scm.fossil-users
'Lo. On 2014-08-19T21:17:18 +0200 Stephan Beal wrote: > > You might be interested in a standalone alternative: > ... > > and has already been created as a standalone binary with documented > semantics: > > http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/libfossil/doxygen/fossil-core_8h.html#a265d03fe1e0