Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Matt Welland
Does fork notification really warrant another setting? If there is a fork on some other branch either fix by merging it or rename one of the legs. There is no sensible need for a fork to exist in a timeline that I can think of. Forks are rare in most repos (the intensely busy repos I deal with

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Matt Welland
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-04-13 6:31 GMT+02:00 Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org: It's not yet merged to trunk, but I have borrowed from Jan's work and merged into the sync-forkwarn branch for what I think will provide a

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:59:38 +0200: I'll do more testing on the sync-forkwarn. Thanks. One thing to note is that I extended the function fossil_find_nearest_fork to be able to work without checking the vmerge table which is only available for a

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:57:53 -0700: Does fork notification really warrant another setting? Generally, I would prefer to avoid another setting, but wanted to make sure. Forks are rare in most repos (the intensely busy repos I deal with seem to be the exception).

[fossil-users] massive shunning

2015-04-13 Thread Gour
Hello, recently I switched from Gnucash to Ledger to keep record of my our finances and everything is under Fossil. The dbstat of the repo looks as follows: repository-size: 428815360 bytes (428.8MB) artifact-count:7731 (stored as 5556 full text and 2175 delta blobs) artifact-sizes:

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-04-13 6:31 GMT+02:00 Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org: It's not yet merged to trunk, but I have borrowed from Jan's work and merged into the sync-forkwarn branch for what I think will provide a better experience (e.g. almost no false positives). I say almost none, because

Re: [fossil-users] SSL Cert expired

2015-04-13 Thread Volker Braun
Richard Hipp drh@... writes: Thanks everybody for letting me know that the SSL cert for SQLite and Fossil has expired. We are working the problem now. It is OK to stop sending me emails about it. The SSL cert is updated now, thanks. But you removed the intermediate certs, so users can't

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: I myself prefer not to see additional info like this that can be derived from querying the db added to the timeline. I'm keen to see the work that Andy and Jan have done make it into the trunk and will test it ASAP.

Re: [fossil-users] SSL Cert expired

2015-04-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On 4/13/15, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote: Richard Hipp drh@... writes: Thanks everybody for letting me know that the SSL cert for SQLite and Fossil has expired. We are working the problem now. It is OK to stop sending me emails about it. The SSL cert is updated now, thanks. But

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:59:38 +0200: - I'm not sure if I want to be reminded when someone else causes a fork on a branch I'm not working on. But if there is such a desire with other people, I'm not principally against it. I asked a question a few days ago