Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said bch on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 18:20:43 -0700: > I think enough churn has happened that this isn't necessarily > conclusive (if i'd known of the fallout, I'd have had a pre-problem > snapshot of the repo set aside so I could faithfully recreate all > steps at whim), but anywa

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Creating index now... 1) This demonstrates (yet again) what a good choice sql was as the high-level language to implement fossil I think enough churn has happened that this isn't necessarily conclusive (if i'd known of the fallout, I'd have had a pre-problem snapshot of the repo set aside so I co

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

Thus said Richard Boehme on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 09:07:54 -0400: > They are distinct, but I needed some way to see what my proxy's > response was, and it looks like it needs to look like a certain web > browser - it looks like the proxy rejects anything that isn't > Internext Explor

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:51:51 -0400: > FWIW, I created that index on Joerg's net-bsd repo and it made a Big > Improvement in performance there. That's good to know. I'm currently downloading the repository, but it's big and will be a while before I can test anything. I

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

On 4/27/15, Richard Boehme wrote: > Unfortunately, I can't install WireShark, so I'm left guessing. . Does > fossil have a setting to change the user-agent string? > No. But you can change the user-agent string at https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/13babac80?ln=971-972 and then recompile

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

Unfortunately, I can't install WireShark, so I'm left guessing. . Does fossil have a setting to change the user-agent string? On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Ron W wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Richard Boehme wrote: > >> Tried again and it didn't hang: >> >> SSL: proxy connect fail

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

On 4/27/15, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:28:26 -0400: > >> .timer on > > That's excellent! I was wondering if sqlite's command line tool had a > profiling tool (having thought of Tcl's time as a useful profiling > feature). > > I'll play around with

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:28:26 -0400: > .timer on That's excellent! I was wondering if sqlite's command line tool had a profiling tool (having thought of Tcl's time as a useful profiling feature). I'll play around with this some to see what various results I get. T

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

On 4/27/15, Richard Hipp wrote: > > (5112 is a valid rcvid value in my local copy of the SQLite > repository). The first version is consistently faster than the > second. > > 57482 > Run Time: real 0.014 user 0.006962 sys 0.007262 > --- > 57482 > Run Time: real 0.027 user 0.02

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

On 4/27/15, Andy Bradford wrote: > Regarding the query: > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/d323fe8c0930a5e850eabf3eb8991d717defe784?txt=1&ln=114,116 > > Would that be better as: > > SELECT pid FROM plink JOIN blob ON blob.rid=plink.cid > WHERE pid>0 AND isprim AND rcvid=:rcvid > > Or i

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:37:09 -0400: > Is that coded needed at all? That's a fair question, and one that we've been debating over the past couple of weeks. Some feel that Fossil should warn about a fork, even those which were created ``silently'' during a sync. Thi

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

On 4/27/15, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:41:22 +0200: > >> a) >> > > I would guess this is the problem, but I could be wrong. Is that coded needed at all? If user X pushes a fork they will

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:41:22 +0200: > a) > I would guess this is the problem, but I could be wrong. If no content is synced, rcvid will be 0, which normally won't be a problem because the only content th

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said bch on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:27:41 -0700: > 1) On a large repo, this takes an inordinate amount of time. On a sync > (with no updates necessary), the runtime is ~45s (on the first > attempt, I stopped it after ~10 mins of running in order to re-run it > with a time(1) command to

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said bch on Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:27:41 -0700: > 1) On a large repo, this takes an inordinate amount of time. On a sync > (with no updates necessary), the runtime is ~45s (on the first > attempt, I stopped it after ~10 mins of running in order to re-run it > with a time(1) command to

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

2015-04-27 23:27 GMT+02:00 bch : > Apparently the "automatic fork check" is in trunk. Which commit caused the regression? Two possibilities: a) b) Regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Apparently the "automatic fork check" is in trunk. 1) On a large repo, this takes an inordinate amount of time. On a sync (with no updates necessary), the runtime is ~45s (on the first attempt, I stopped it after ~10 mins of running in order to re-run it with a time(1) command to collect info) on

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Richard Boehme wrote: > Tried again and it didn't hang: > > SSL: proxy connect failed with HTTP status code 403 > Sync done, sent: 0 received: 0 ip: > HTTP 403 is a general "forbidden" response. Further explanation by the server sending this response is optiona

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

Tried again and it didn't hang: SSL: proxy connect failed with HTTP status code 403 Sync done, sent: 0 received: 0 ip: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Ron W wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Richard Boehme wrote: > >> They are distinct, but I needed some way to see what my proxy's

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

Thus said Richard Hipp on Sun, 26 Apr 2015 18:34:23 -0400: > The "forks" query parameter to the /timeline page now shows recent > forks in the check-in DAG. For this page, a "fork" means a check-in > with two or more children in the same branch. No attempt is made to > distinguish betwee

[fossil-users] ++ignore option

The existing --ignore option overrides any "ignores" in the project's settings. Sometimes, it would be very useful to have a "++ignore" option to specify additional "ignores". ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fo

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Richard Boehme wrote: > They are distinct, but I needed some way to see what my proxy's > response was, and it looks like it needs to look like a certain web > browser - it looks like the proxy rejects anything that isn't > Internext Explorer 9. When I try to conn

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

They are distinct, but I needed some way to see what my proxy's response was, and it looks like it needs to look like a certain web browser - it looks like the proxy rejects anything that isn't Internext Explorer 9. When I try to connect using Fossil, it simply hangs. On 4/27/15, Richard Hipp wro

Re: [fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

On 4/27/15, Richard Boehme wrote: > Is there any way to set the browser fossil identifies itself as when > communicating by proxy? Trying to connect via PuTTY to my server gives > 403 NotSupportedBrowser, so I figure something similar is happening > with Fossil when it tries to connect and can't.

[fossil-users] fossil proxy web browser

Is there any way to set the browser fossil identifies itself as when communicating by proxy? Trying to connect via PuTTY to my server gives 403 NotSupportedBrowser, so I figure something similar is happening with Fossil when it tries to connect and can't. -- Thank you. Richard Boehme Email: rbo