[fossil-users] Version 1.33

2015-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
Fossil version 1.33 has been tagged. Binaries are available on the download page: https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8

[fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread tonyp
Q1: How do I solve this? (I have already tried ./configure and didn’t make any difference) ./bld/piechart.o: In function `piechart_render': ./src/piechart.c:176: undefined reference to `sincos' ./src/piechart.c:179: undefined reference to `sincos' ./src/piechart.c:191: undefined reference to `si

Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 04:27:31PM +0300, to...@acm.org wrote: >Q1: How do I solve this?  (I have already tried ./configure and didn’t >make any difference) >  >./bld/piechart.o: In function `piechart_render': >./src/piechart.c:176: undefined reference to `sincos' >./src/pie

Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread Richie Adler
Martin Gagnon decía, en el mensaje "Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?" del 23/5/2015 10:53:25: > May be I'm a bit too parano, but every time I build from source after an > update I do a make clean and a ./configure. > > $ fossil up > $ make clean

Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On 5/23/15, Richie Adler wrote: > Martin Gagnon decía, en el mensaje "Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation > problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?" del 23/5/2015 10:53:25: >> May be I'm a bit too parano, but every time I build from source after an >> update I do a make clean and a ./configur

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33

2015-05-23 Thread Oliver Friedrich
I just updated my Ubuntu PPA for this. Since I have several Problems with the versioning scheme of ubuntu, I just changed the PPA to use revision-dates as version numbers. *Visit and use my PPA if you like: ppa:beowulfof/fossil-scm* Richard Hipp schrieb am Sa., 23. Mai 2015 um 13:47 Uhr: > Fos

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33

2015-05-23 Thread Svyatoslav Mishyn
(Sat, 23 May 07:47) Richard Hipp: > Fossil version 1.33 has been tagged. Binaries are available on the > download page: https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html link "http://localhost:8080/reports"; doesn't work; + fixes for the sitemap: Index: src/sitemap.c ===

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33

2015-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On 5/23/15, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > (Sat, 23 May 07:47) Richard Hipp: >> Fossil version 1.33 has been tagged. Binaries are available on the >> download page: https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > link "http://localhost:8080/reports"; doesn't work; For what browser does it not work? W

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.33

2015-05-23 Thread Svyatoslav Mishyn
(Sat, 23 May 13:50) Richard Hipp: > On 5/23/15, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > > link "http://localhost:8080/reports"; doesn't work; > > For what browser does it not work? if it matters, Firefox 36.0, but /tmp: wget -S http://localhost:8080/reports --2015-05-23 21:42:12-- http://localhost:8080/rep

Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread tonyp
OK, got it working with these 3 steps: make clean ./configure make Q2: Do I need a rebuild after going to v1.33 from v1.32? Regarding Q2 I meant is a FOSSIL REBUILD required when going from 1.32 to 1.33? Although it seems the database schema hasn't changed from fossil v1.32 (based on f

Re: [fossil-users] Linux compilation problem (Ubuntu v14) and is rebuild needed?

2015-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On 5/23/15, to...@acm.org wrote: > OK, got it working with these 3 steps: > make clean > ./configure > make > >>Q2: Do I need a rebuild after going to v1.33 from v1.32? > > Regarding Q2 I meant is a FOSSIL REBUILD required when going from 1.32 to > 1.33? I don't think so. -- D. Richard Hipp