Re: [fossil-users] Filtered Attribute of HTML tag in Wiki Rendering

2015-07-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:35 AM, John Laurence Poole wrote: > http://localhost";>default text here > > The attribute "is" and it value are removed. > > Where would this filtering of attributes be occurring? I'd like > to see if I can specify that "is" is a valid attribute. > See: http://fo

[fossil-users] Filtered Attribute of HTML tag in Wiki Rendering

2015-07-22 Thread John Laurence Poole
I'm exploring HTML5 extensions and seeing if they would work in Fossil. What I found is that if I have saved on a wiki page the following an extended tag that contains two attributes: http://localhost"; >default text here the page as rendered removes the "is" attribute and allows the src, s

Re: [fossil-users] close leaf from command-line, and 'apropos(1)'-like behaviour?

2015-07-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
Ok, changing the help-pages to be able to iterate over options is indeed a lot of work, I guess. I made a simple Bash-script to do 'sort of' what I meant, in a very limited way, but I find it quite useful already. Script pasted below and available at http://home.mircad.nl/md/fossil_apropos_search

Re: [fossil-users] Any interest in testing/merging check-in-edit branch?

2015-07-22 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:18:15 +0200: > AFAIK there's simply been nobody who's wanted to use it this way (or > nobody who's complained about not being able to). Fair enough, I'll leave it out until someone else requests the ability to add more than one tag at a time while

Re: [fossil-users] moving part of existing branch onto another branch

2015-07-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 July 2015 at 07:47, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Michai Ramakers on Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:48:03 +0200: > >> If I then move B to new branch 'parked-here', then move D (back) to >> trunk, then close leaf A, is the result something that could cause >> problems later on? (If so, which o

Re: [fossil-users] revert all files: doesn't work

2015-07-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 July 2015 at 12:46, Michai Ramakers > > right, but 'fossil revert MyRevision' (w/o files) ... I meant 'fossil revert -r MyRevision' of course Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:808

Re: [fossil-users] revert all files: doesn't work

2015-07-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 July 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> This does not answer your question, but perhaps what you were looking >> for (i.e. revert all files in the local check-out to a revision) is >> 'fossil update REVISION". > > That will m

Re: [fossil-users] revert all files: doesn't work

2015-07-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > This does not answer your question, but perhaps what you were looking > for (i.e. revert all files in the local check-out to a revision) is > 'fossil update REVISION". > That will merge in any local differences. Doing 'fossil checkout REV

Re: [fossil-users] Any interest in testing/merging check-in-edit branch?

2015-07-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Also, I just realized, while there is no limit in the manifest design, > nor is there a limit elsewhere internal, does this mean that the Fossil > CLI has to allow someone to submit more than a fixed number? If they > want to design

Re: [fossil-users] submitting issue reports to/about fossil-scm.org

2015-07-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > My $0.02: problem reports / questions / comments should probably go to > this mailing-list first Yes - please post bugs/suggestions/questions here first. On rare occasions one of the devs will ask you to open a ticket, but tickets opene