Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

2015-07-29 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Michai Ramakers wrote: > > I was unclear; this is the corresponding timeline: > > === 2015-07-29 === > 19:58:39 [70b61c707b] *CURRENT* x (user: michai tags: trunk) >DELETED d/dd/f >DELETED d/f >ADDED e/dd/f >ADDED e/f > 19:57:26 [998d26af68] a (user: michai tags: trunk) >ADDED

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

2015-07-29 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 29 July 2015 at 22:02, Michai Ramakers wrote: > On 29 July 2015 at 21:29, Joe Mistachkin wrote: >> >> Michai Ramakers wrote: >>> >>> Right... creating the target-dir 'd2' beforehand worked in my case; >>> any subdir existing under 'd' seems to be moved under 'd2' afterwards. >>> >> >> I think

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

2015-07-29 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 29 July 2015 at 22:02, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > (the corresponding timeline shows 2 added and 2 deleted files, and > history is lost) I mean of course: there is no relation between the added and deleted files, history-wise. Michai ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

2015-07-29 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 29 July 2015 at 21:29, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Michai Ramakers wrote: >> >> Right... creating the target-dir 'd2' beforehand worked in my case; >> any subdir existing under 'd' seems to be moved under 'd2' afterwards. >> > > I think the following change will fix the issue: > > https:/

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

2015-07-29 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Michai Ramakers wrote: > > Right... creating the target-dir 'd2' beforehand worked in my case; > any subdir existing under 'd' seems to be moved under 'd2' afterwards. > I think the following change will fix the issue: https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/b86127e187a00bfc -- Joe Mista

Re: [fossil-users] Unintuitive CGI error message with missing /tmp directory in chroot.

2015-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Paul Pereira wrote: > The path /var/www is the chroot folder. It is not publicly visible by > Ah, right - chroot. i run on a cheap shared hoster where chroot isn't an option, so i've never used that feature :/. > I would add > - Fossil must be able to create te

Re: [fossil-users] Unintuitive CGI error message with missing /tmp directory in chroot.

2015-07-29 Thread Paul Pereira
Hi Stephan, On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Paul Pereira wrote: > It's not common practice (for me, at least) to put the repo file in a path > reachable by www clients. On my hoster all of my CGI-hosted repos live in > some dir under my home dir, writable by my account, the CGI scripts all > po

Re: [fossil-users] check-in-edit branch ready?

2015-07-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:02:49 -0700: > It might be nice to have test coverage for the new command. Yes, very good point. I'll add some later today (time permitting). Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400055b90a22 ___ fossi

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

2015-07-29 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 29 July 2015 at 16:50, Michai Ramakers wrote: > Hello, > > using 'fossil mv' for the first time, and for some reason I don't > understand what happens here (see pasted output) - instead of renaming > a dir, it creates a zero-byte file (and leaves the original dir > as-is). > > I have the feelin

Re: [fossil-users] Unintuitive CGI error message with missing /tmp directory in chroot.

2015-07-29 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Paul Pereira wrote: > It may be worth mentioning in the CGI setup instructions that > Fossil/sqlite needs to be able to create temporary files for rollback logs > in some manner particular to the OS, such as by writing to /tmp. > > In my case, I installed Fossil a

[fossil-users] Unintuitive CGI error message with missing /tmp directory in chroot.

2015-07-29 Thread Paul Pereira
It may be worth mentioning in the CGI setup instructions that Fossil/sqlite needs to be able to create temporary files for rollback logs in some manner particular to the OS, such as by writing to /tmp. In my case, I installed Fossil according to the standard chroot procedure in OpenBSD for CGI app

Re: [fossil-users] Link to latest version of filename

2015-07-29 Thread Richard Hipp
On 7/29/15, Sean Woods wrote: > If I use the URL /artifact/ I am taken to a source code > listing of . > > How can I do the same by filename? Suppose I want the HEAD version of a > given file, and I always want that URL to point to the HEAD version? > > Also (if not too much trouble) -- if someon

[fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

2015-07-29 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, using 'fossil mv' for the first time, and for some reason I don't understand what happens here (see pasted output) - instead of renaming a dir, it creates a zero-byte file (and leaves the original dir as-is). I have the feeling I'm doing something really simple really wrong. Ideas..? Mich

[fossil-users] Link to latest version of filename

2015-07-29 Thread Sean Woods
If I use the URL /artifact/ I am taken to a source code listing of . How can I do the same by filename? Suppose I want the HEAD version of a given file, and I always want that URL to point to the HEAD version? Also (if not too much trouble) -- if someone could point me to the code where this is

Re: [fossil-users] fine(r) commit granularity

2015-07-29 Thread Paolo Bolzoni
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Steve Stefanovich wrote: >> From: Paolo Bolzoni >> Sent: Wednesday, 29 July 2015 08:38 >> fossil commit "filename" >> might help you in your problem? > It gets messy when there is a number of files, on Windows at least where > using pipes and xargs is limited co

[fossil-users] no unmerged forks / no common ancestor messages - bug?

2015-07-29 Thread Steve Stefanovich
I would appreciate if anyone on the list can clarify if the following is a bug or expected behaviour. I hope the diagrams will come out OK when this is posted. I'm developing some features in 'x' branch, with a plan to merge periodically in another branch 'y', when stable. So I have added some f