Hi Warren,
On Aug 26, 2015, at 5:28 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
> wrote:
>>
>> we wondered if it could be used to track changes to these configuration
>> files in a way a non-developer type could easily understand.
>
> Did you look at etckeeper, an
On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>
> we wondered if it could be used to track changes to these configuration files
> in a way a non-developer type could easily understand.
Did you look at etckeeper, and if so, why did you reject it?
https://joeyh.name/code/etckeeper/
> Lo
Hi Richard and Fossil folks,
I'm Lonnie Abelbeck, a developer with the AstLinux Open Source project (
http://www.astlinux.org ) an x86 image, only 50 MB in size, geared primarily to
implement the Asterisk PBX, but we do a lot more than just a PBX.
Richard kindly requested I forward some info he
I am sorry it took me so long to get to this. I don't know if it is still
relevant for you, but I fixed this here:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/24048eadf9247452
--
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
___
fossil-users mailing list
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Wayne Hajas wrote:
> Later, I look at the time-line for the repository, and all the line-breaks
> are gone from my change-description. It is all one run-on paragraph.
>
Go to the admin page in the web UI, then go to the time line settings page
and check "*Allow
On 26 August 2015 at 04:27, Luca Ferrari wrote:
>
> Correct!
> Shame on me.
Not shame, at all! Some of the reasons for things are useful to think
about, and because a popular system (e.g. GIT) does it a particular way can
make us think it is the right way without thinking carefully. I didn't
I would try configure Fossil on Windows to use Wordpad instead of Notepad.
Wordpad does not need CR to treat NL properly.
BR,
Johan
On Aug 26, 2015 5:14 PM, "Wayne Hajas" wrote:
> I am using fossil under Windows 7.
>
> After I check-in some files to fossil, a notepad-window pops up to let me
> d
I am using fossil under Windows 7.
After I check-in some files to fossil, a notepad-window pops up to let
me describe the changes that have been made. Later, I look at the
time-line for the repository, and all the line-breaks are gone from my
change-description. It is all one run-on paragrap
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> Committing without first checking whether the commit was _semantically_
> successful is _just plain wrong_. git does it that way, but that is a huge
> flaw in its thinking (IMHO). A successful merge only means that the SCM was
> capable of m
Would you trust a merge algorithm that you software is correct
post-merge ? Even if there are no merge conflicts there is no way to
know whether the result is correct :)
Stanislav Paskalev
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> Hi all,
> this could sound trivial, but why the merg
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> Hi all,
> this could sound trivial, but why the merge (especially with
> --integrate) does not prompt immediately for a commit? What is the
> rationale of having merge and commit as separate actions when closing
> branches? The only one that
11 matches
Mail list logo
