Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

2015-11-01 Thread Scott Robison
On Nov 1, 2015 6:09 PM, "Ron W" wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: >> >> But if it only stores a pointer, and requires the user to reconstruct the link, it's not terribly useful/friendly. The user would potentially have to replace fossil's placeholder pseudosymlink fil

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

2015-11-01 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > But if it only stores a pointer, and requires the user to reconstruct the > link, it's not terribly useful/friendly. The user would potentially have to > replace fossil's placeholder pseudosymlink file with a link of his own > (which he could

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

2015-11-01 Thread Matt Welland
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Matt Welland > wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Beal >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Matt Welland >>> wrote: >>> BTW, to some extent it is ok for fossil to be opin

[fossil-users] config.log messages

2015-11-01 Thread jungle Boogie
Hello All, Not sure if this means anything but I peaked at config.log after building fossil from source: FreeBSD 10.2-release: % cat config.log Invoked as: ./configure --with-openssl=/usr/local/bin/openssl Failed: cc -g -O2 conftest__.c -o conftest__ /tmp/conftest__-f2b4ed.o: In function `main':

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil server

2015-11-01 Thread Damien Sykes-Pendleton
Hi all, Thanks to all of you who have responded. I have managed to find the program that was hogging the port and therefore got Fossil up and running again. Thanks. Damien. -Original Message- From: Thomas Schnurrenberger Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2015 12:44 PM To: fossil-users@lists

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil server

2015-11-01 Thread Thomas Schnurrenberger
On 01.11.2015 13:06, Damien Sykes-Pendleton wrote: > What reasons could Fossil be unable to listen on a certain port and is there > anything I’m missing that I should be doing to allow it access? > Did you check the settings of the Windows Firewall? -- tsbg ___

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil server

2015-11-01 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 01/11/15 13:30, Damien Sykes-Pendleton wrote: > I’m running Windows. I’m not personally running anything on port 80, though I > get a blank web page (as opposed to a 404 or problem loading error) when I > visit localhost. I forget the name of the tool, but in there's a nifty tool for Windo

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil server

2015-11-01 Thread Damien Sykes-Pendleton
Hi Stephan, I’m running Windows. I’m not personally running anything on port 80, though I get a blank web page (as opposed to a 404 or problem loading error) when I visit localhost. Thanks. Damien. From: Stephan Beal Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2015 12:10 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Sub

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil server

2015-11-01 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Damien Sykes-Pendleton < dam...@dcpendleton.plus.com> wrote: > “Unable to open listening socket on ports 80” > My last machine ran the server on port 80 without issue. Port 80 is the > port that I have forwarded on my router, I tried with the default port and > it a

[fossil-users] Fossil server

2015-11-01 Thread Damien Sykes-Pendleton
Hi, I have just got myself a new computer and am trying to restart my Fossil server, but for some reason it comes up with the message: “Unable to open listening socket on ports 80” My last machine ran the server on port 80 without issue. Port 80 is the port that I have forwarded on my router, I t

Re: [fossil-users] xkcd on git

2015-11-01 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Beal > wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Matt Welland >> wrote: >> >>> BTW, to some extent it is ok for fossil to be opinionated software that >>> strives to dictate how to do your work.