Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

2016-01-17 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Steve Stefanovich wrote: > I think it is a good idea.‎ It would be especially useful for search > results - see: > Should not be hard. The core functionality required is available in libmagic (which is available for MS Windows as well as

[fossil-users] A dirty suggestion for the time‑line

2016-01-17 Thread Yannick Duchêne
What about having a span with a proper class for tags and user in the time line, just like it already is with `` and ``? By the way, all semantically distinguishable fragments could be subject to the same, although coming‑back to Fossil after a long time, I have not checked if it really lacks

Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

2016-01-17 Thread Sergei Gavrikov
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, Baruch Burstein wrote: > I don't seem to see this problem. go to > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/dir?ci=tip. I clicked on > "COPYRIGHT-BSD2.txt" and was given the text. If I click "Download" on > that page, I am given just the raw text. That's right. But I pointed on

Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

2016-01-17 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, Baruch Burstein wrote: > > > When *text* files have unknown MIME type (unknown extension) we > > > cannot download them (in a fact to get a raw view in a browser) just > > > in click. > >

Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

2016-01-17 Thread Sergei Gavrikov
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, Stephan Beal wrote: > The mime type is normally guessed based on the file name. How do you > propose fossil determines the mime type of: > > >   echo a>a > f add a > f ci -private -m 'add a' > > > without itself having a full-featured

Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

2016-01-17 Thread Steve Stefanovich
I think it is a good idea.‎ It would be especially useful for search results - see: http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/pipermail/fossil-users/2015-March/020624.html ‎-- S. No guess at all. Why? [Raw] button will force appending '=text' to 'Download' URL. Click on [Raw] is mean "you know what you

[fossil-users] Revert vs checkout

2016-01-17 Thread Yannick Duchêne
Except `checkout` fails if there are edited files, is there any big difference between `revert` and `checkout`? Also, what is the purpose of `checkout --keep`? What would be an example use‑case? -- Yannick Duchêne ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Revert vs checkout

2016-01-17 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Yannick Duchêne wrote: > Except `checkout` fails if there are edited files, is there any big > difference between `revert` and `checkout`? > They can be used for purposes of backing out changes irrevocably, > Also, what is the