Re: [fossil-users] Rejected JSON tests

2016-05-31 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Kain Abel wrote: > I've slightly modified your line from the top: > lm@um:~/src/fossil$ gcc -c -pedantic -I./src -Wall -Werror -fPIC > -Wstrict-aliasing -g -Wno-long-long -std=c89 ./src/cson_amalgamation.c > -DFOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON -Og > lm@um:~/src/fossil$ gcc -c -pe

Re: [fossil-users] Rejected JSON tests

2016-05-31 Thread Kain Abel
Hi Stephan, again, I beg your pardon. My work ate all the time. I've slightly modified your line from the top: lm@um:~/src/fossil$ gcc -c -pedantic -I./src -Wall -Werror -fPIC -Wstrict-aliasing -g -Wno-long-long -std=c89 ./src/cson_amalgamation.c -DFOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON -Og lm@um:~/src/fossil$ gcc -

Re: [fossil-users] Rejected JSON tests

2016-05-31 Thread Kain Abel
Hi Ross, sorry for the late reply. My day job ate all the time. Thanks for the tip. 'apt-get install tcllib' solved the problem. Best regards and thanks, Kain 2016-05-27 22:52 GMT+02:00 Ross Berteig : > The issue here is that you don't have the json package installed in your > copy of Tcl with

Re: [fossil-users] Weird cross-contamination between two fossil repositories (and not even talking to server!)

2016-05-31 Thread Ron W
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:39 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote: > > In message <38334f96-17cf-e32a-e758-2d15ce5fd...@cheshireeng.com>, > Ross Berteig writes: > >One of the hooks is "command_hook" which is invoked for every > >fossil command. That name can raise an error (or call break or > >continue) to

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

2016-05-31 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote: >> So the branch 'feature-installazioni' is closed, and is merged. >> I'm a little confused. > > A merge doesn't automatically close a branch, it must be instructed so. The c

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

2016-05-31 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote: > So the branch 'feature-installazioni' is closed, and is merged. > I'm a little confused. A merge doesn't automatically close a branch, it must be instructed so. Joerg ___ fossil-users maili

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

2016-05-31 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > WARNING: multiple open leaf check-ins on trunk: > (1) 2016-05-30 15:25:09 [fc75337a99] (current) > (2) 2015-11-19 14:08:50 [aa9521ccd9] > (3) 2015-08-26 08:18:19 [c413c4592a] I've tried to inspect one of the open leaf: % fossil leaves

Re: [fossil-users] --nosync option for merge, update, checkout when disconnected

2016-05-31 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Scott Robison wrote: > DRH: I suspect you never sleep. > fwiw, i have never seen him sleep. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who

Re: [fossil-users] --nosync option for merge, update, checkout when disconnected

2016-05-31 Thread Scott Robison
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 2:47 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote: > In message y...@mail.gmail.com> > , > Richard Hipp writes: > >On 5/30/16, John P. Rouillard wrote: > >> > >> Does it make sense to follow the checkin model for merge/up? > > > >Yes it does. > > > >But I'm kinda busy with more urgent ma

[fossil-users] winsymlink branch

2016-05-31 Thread Scott Robison
Just an announcement in case anyone is using the winsymlink branch (which seems unlikely to me). I've merged the current trunk into winsymlink. The only functionality exposed in the winsymlink branch, other than what's in trunk, is Windows symbolic links. Carry on. -- Scott Robison