Steve Stefanovich wrote:
>
> It looks like it has not been compiled with the correct flag. Can this be
> amended and correct version posted? It is confusing. Summarised here:
>
You can obtain the "all features enabled", signed Fossil 1.35 binary for
Windows here:
http://urn.to/r/fossi
It looks like it has not been compiled with the correct flag. Can this be
amended and correct version posted? It is confusing. Summarised here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg20823.html
Cheers,
Steve
___
fossil-use
Hi Tony,
I think your finding is something like I’ve spotted also in the ticket overview
pages [1].
This needs someone willing to submit a patch fixing these issues… Sorry, I
hadn’t found the time to deal with this myself up to now.
Greets,
Marko
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users
Hi,
People read docs : this is one way to find typos... :-)just sayin'
Best Regards
K.
De : Richard Hipp
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Mardi 21 juin 2016 20h04
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Fossil :: typos
On 6/21/16, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote:
> Hi, just found a few t
On 6/21/16, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote:
> Hi, just found a few typos.
Fixed now. Thanks.
How did you find these? Are you reading through the code line by line?
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-
Hi, just found a few typos.
--
https://www.juef.tk/
Index: src/allrepo.c
==
--- src/allrepo.c
+++ src/allrepo.c
@@ -138,11 +138,11 @@
**
** In addition, the following maintenance operations are supported:
**
**add Ad
This is fossil version 1.35 [3aa86af6aa] 2016-06-14 11:10:39 UTC
It’d be less confusing if BISECT displayed the date/time the same way as the
current timeline setting.
Thanks.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists
7 matches
Mail list logo
