Hi,
Here is FYI suggestion to make compatibility of autosetup to support the
system expecting typical autoconf/automake options while not killing
nice option checking feature of autosetup via --disable-option-checking.
As I see output of "./configure --help" on autoconf/automake based code,
I see
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 10:27:44AM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
> autosetup already supports --disable-option-checking (like autoconf)
> Why wouldn't that be good enough?
Thanks. This makes sense.
I will ask Debian package to use it. This is cleaner approach.
Also, I will double check wha
> On 15 Oct 2016, at 6:59 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a trivial patch to build the source tree even with unknown options
> for autosetup/autosetup but make sure to warn user.
>
> The idea is from Barak A. Pearlmutter.
>
> Regards,
>
> Osamu
autosetup already supports --disable
Hi,
1/ Thank you Osamu Aoki !
2/ make it simple :if someone, let's call him John, would like to create a
special option "--butter=salted" and one day Fossil did it then IMHO John
should change his option, like "--my-butter=salted".In fact, I think that an
unknown option should be logged "unknown
On 15 October 2016 at 05:26, Steven Gawroriski
wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 05:59:23 +0900
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a trivial patch to build the source tree even with unknown
> > options for autosetup/autosetup but make sure to warn user.
> >
> > The idea is from Barak A. Pe
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 05:59:23 +0900
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a trivial patch to build the source tree even with unknown
> options for autosetup/autosetup but make sure to warn user.
>
> The idea is from Barak A. Pearlmutter.
>
> Regards,
>
> Osamu
>
> PS: re-send from subscribed ad
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 05:59:50AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> These 2 files should be the same ... I hoped but reality is a bit
> complicated. They are very similar but the mark field is strange.
No, the marks are derived from the rid and those again depend on the
order in which blobs are added.
Hi,
As a part of sanity check, I made an export of fossil archive to a file
and back into another fossil archive ... and re-export to a file.
These 2 files should be the same ... I hoped but reality is a bit
complicated. They are very similar but the mark field is strange.
The initial export st
Hi,
Here is a trivial patch to build the source tree even with unknown options
for autosetup/autosetup but make sure to warn user.
The idea is from Barak A. Pearlmutter.
Regards,
Osamu
PS: re-send from subscribed addess
From: "Barak A. Pearlmutter"
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 08:05:52 +0900
Subject
Hi,
> Please note these are clean reverse engineered dedes independent of the
> code in the git using the code analysis result included.
Of course, I meant s/dedes/codes/
> The default of the quoting flag is FALSE. The meaning of the conversion rule
> indicators are the following:
Hmmm... patc
Hi,
I have a set of working patches for "fossil export" and "fossil import"
as attached.
Please note these are clean reverse engineered dedes independent of the
code in the git using the code analysis result included.
These codes are BSD-2-Clause licensed and I agree to copyright
assignment to H
(Thu, 13 Oct 08:25) Nickolas Lloyd:
> At a cursory glance, it looks like the `fsl' tool would allow you to do
> something similar: just define a new `fsl' command that will do the
> commit, export, and push all in one step.
So, now I just use a function that imitates a post-commit hook.
Not perfec
12 matches
Mail list logo