Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Karel Gardas
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > No. What repo checksum does is compute a separate checksum over the > concatenation of all files. Uf, so I've been completely off the picture. Thanks for correction! ___ fossil-users mailing li

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread K. Fossil user
Hi, @Martin Vahi said : > « [...] CPU is AMD 64bit [...] » I don't know what AMD 64 means for you : it could be a dual core or a Quad core, and who knows an optocore... The amount of RAM could let the calculation of the Checksum be faster ... The bus speed can help a lot etc. > « [...] The upli

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: > >> Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a > >> lot, but then make sure you ar

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Karel Gardas
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: >> Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a >> lot, but then make sure you are on the filesystem like ZFS/btrfs which >> does that for you transpar

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: > Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a > lot, but then make sure you are on the filesystem like ZFS/btrfs which > does that for you transparently and you do not need to do that on the > fossil side. Eh,

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Karel Gardas
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Martin Vahi wrote: > It is about 4.4GiB, over 100k files, over 6k folders, > but it should not be that bad. After all, that's what > many projects look like in 2016. This statement is IMHO a bit unfair. You basically grab *4* subversions trees (if I count well) and

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Nikita Borodikhin
Try setting repo-cksum property off, it should help a lot. By default Fossil double-checks all the files on disk to make sure their contents is not changed. That's fine for a small project, but for large ones Nikita On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 8:29 PM Martin Vahi wrote: > Reproduction: > >