On 2/24/17, Warren Young wrote:
> While poking around inside the Fossil DB, I came away with several
> questions:
>
> 1. What is event.euser? This column seems completely unused on my largest
> repository. (select distinct count(euser) from event == 0) I’ve tried
> grepping the source, and all
On 2/23/2017 4:01 PM, Warren Young wrote:
The PHC scheme would allow Fossil to migrate to something stronger in a
backwards-compatible fashion:
https://github.com/P-H-C/phc-string-format/blob/master/phc-sf-spec.md
That is, if the hash argument in the F, P, and Q cards is not 40 characters
On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:01:56PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>> But now we have new data.
>> Before, this sort of attack was theoretical only. Now it’s not only
>> proven possible, it is already within the ROI budget for certain
>> spe
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:32:20AM -0800, bch wrote:
> Are you saing:
>
> contenthash = sha256(content);
> identifier = sha256 (contenthash . blobtype . conentsize . content);
>
> "blobtype" == cardtype ?
Yes.
Joerg
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossi
Are you saing:
contenthash = sha256(content);
identifier = sha256 (contenthash . blobtype . conentsize . content);
"blobtype" == cardtype ?
-bch
On 2/24/17, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:01:56PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>> Second, there will be those who say we’ve
On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:27:11AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>> What table did I miss updating? Where is “fossil clone” getting the old
>> user names from?
>
> From the blob table :)
I assume you mean the U card in the manifest BLOB
While poking around inside the Fossil DB, I came away with several questions:
1. What is event.euser? This column seems completely unused on my largest
repository. (select distinct count(euser) from event == 0) I’ve tried
grepping the source, and all I saw is a bunch of coalesce(user,euser) s
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:27:11AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> What table did I miss updating? Where is “fossil clone” getting the old user
> names from?
From the blob table :)
Joerg
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
htt
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:01:56PM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> Second, there will be those who say we’ve covered all of this already,
> multiple times. I know, I was there. But now we have new data.
> Before, this sort of attack was theoretical only. Now it’s not only
> proven possible, it is a
While looking at the main /reports page (Timeline Events by User) on a
long-lived repo originally converted from Subversion (itself converted from
CVS), I saw some old user names that don’t match the user names currently
defined in Fossil’s user table. These were imported from our prior SCM(s)
10 matches
Mail list logo
