[fossil-users] Progress report of Fossil 2.x

Discussion of Fossil 2.x continues on the fossil-dev mailing list. I am offering this update to the broader fossil-users community to elicit feedback. (1) Moving forward, Fossil repositories will be able to name artifacts using either the legacy SHA1 hash or using a SHA3-256 hash. Both hashes

Re: [fossil-users] Proposed roadmap for Fossil 2.0

On Feb 27, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2017, at 6:34 PM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > >>> how is it possible for someone to inject a 'bad' file with the same SHA1 as >>> a 'good' file already in the repo? >> Your attacker could be

[fossil-users] update Fossil performance chart?

Hi All, This is most likely a request only Dr. Hipp can fulfill has he has access to all the databases. Is it possible for this chart to be updated? https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/stats.wiki It was last updated two years ago to the day. Fossil will be ten years old this