On Sun 03 Jun 2018 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org,
> apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional
> "slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large
> variety of sources.
>
> So, if anybody
On Sun 03 Jun 2018 11:06 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 6/3/18, Jungle Boogie wrote:
> > On Sun 03 Jun 2018 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >> On 6/3/18, jungle Boogie wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Since it's linked from the homepage, maybe this can be updated to show
> >> > that
> >> > a) project website
On 6/3/18, Jungle Boogie wrote:
> On Sun 03 Jun 2018 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> On 6/3/18, jungle Boogie wrote:
>> >
>> > Since it's linked from the homepage, maybe this can be updated to show
>> > that
>> > a) project website is still updated and b) to show fossil is still
>> > efficient.
On Sun 03 Jun 2018 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 6/3/18, jungle Boogie wrote:
> >
> > Since it's linked from the homepage, maybe this can be updated to show that
> > a) project website is still updated and b) to show fossil is still
> > efficient.
> >
> >
On Sun 03 Jun 2018 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org,
> apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional
> "slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large
> variety of sources.
>
> So, if anybody
On 6/3/18, Joseph R. Justice wrote:
>
> Neither is Git.
>
The point is that Fossil comes bundled with many of the same features
as GitHub/GitLab. So the comparison is no so much of Fossil-vs-Git,
but Fossil-vs-Git(Hub|Lab).
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
On 6/3/18, jungle Boogie wrote:
>
> Since it's linked from the homepage, maybe this can be updated to show that
> a) project website is still updated and b) to show fossil is still
> efficient.
>
> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/stats.wiki
>
Updated.
--
D. Richard Hipp
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 9:33 PM Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 6/3/18, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > So, if anybody sees any last minute tidying up that we need to do...
>
> For example, on the front page
> (https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki), what if
> I add some text to item 8
On 6:28PM, Sun, Jun 3, 2018 Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org,
> apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional
> "slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large
> variety of sources.
>
> So, if anybody
On 03/06/18 20:28, Richard Hipp wrote:
> There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org,
> apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional
> "slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large
> variety of sources.
>
> So, if anybody sees any
Too snarky, IMHO.
State the positive, let the reader figure the negative.
Steve
On 4 Jun 2018, 9:33 AM +0800, Richard Hipp , wrote:
> On 6/3/18, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > So, if anybody sees any last minute tidying up that we need to do...
>
> For example, on the front page
>
On 6/3/18, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> So, if anybody sees any last minute tidying up that we need to do...
For example, on the front page
(https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki), what if
I add some text to item 8 to talk about how Fossil is "Independent and
not beholden to
There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org,
apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional
"slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large
variety of sources.
So, if anybody sees any last minute tidying up that we need to do to
the
On 2018-06-04 02:24, Stephan Beal wrote:
>>> It does kind of make sense: the global leader in creating
>>> market-leading-yet-unusable software acquires one more piece of
>>> market-leading-yet-unusable software.
>>
>>This appeals to my sense of order. :)
>
> Though, to be fair: github goes
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:08 AM, Jan Danielsson
wrote:
> On 2018-06-04 00:35, Stephan Beal wrote:
> [---]
> > It does kind of make sense: the global leader in creating
> > market-leading-yet-unusable software acquires one more piece of
> > market-leading-yet-unusable software.
>
>This appeals
On 2018-06-04 00:35, Stephan Beal wrote:
[---]
> It does kind of make sense: the global leader in creating
> market-leading-yet-unusable software acquires one more piece of
> market-leading-yet-unusable software.
This appeals to my sense of order. :)
--
Kind Regards,
Jan Danielsson
This is currently just a rumor, but a juicy one which should interest some
Fossil users:
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/3/17422752/microsoft-github-acquisition-rumors
It does kind of make sense: the global leader in creating
market-leading-yet-unusable software acquires one more piece of
17 matches
Mail list logo
