Re: [fossil-users] bundles

On Oct 21, 2013 10:09 AM, "Ron Wilson" wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Tom Hines wrote: >> >> Hello. I'm a big fan of fossil and would like to use it, but it's missing one feature that I need. Something equivalent to Mercurial's bundle. A bundle is a collection of changesets in a

Re: [fossil-users] Update of checkout after push operations.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:06 PM, John Found wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:42:48 -0700 > Brian Smith wrote: > > > I had success with this line to execute fossil: > > /usr/bin/env -i HOME=$(pwd) /usr/local/bin/fossil ls 2>&1 > > It runs fossil with the

Re: [fossil-users] Update of checkout after push operations.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:55 PM, John Found wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:01:23 -0700 > Brian Smith wrote: > > > If I may chime in - if you do not need the updates to be _instantaneous_ > > upon push... > > A cronjob scheduled to run once a minute and simply run &#

Re: [fossil-users] Update of checkout after push operations.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:42 PM, John Found wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:36:23 +0200 >> Stephan Beal wrote: >> >> > Looking at your last script, everything "looks fine" to me. i'm out of >> > ideas :/. >> >> And what is really weird,

Re: [fossil-users] List of checkins

Another way, just to add to the list: echo -e ".mode csv\nselect uuid from event, blob where event.objid=blob.rid and type='ci' and mtime > julianday('2012-05-27');" | fsl sqlite -B On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: >

Re: [fossil-users] Pulling and pushing branches based on tags?

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Christopher Berardi wrote: > A thought that occurred to me that would be a nice feature to compliment > our hopefully forthcoming per-branch push/pull implementation is the > ability to do the same, but using a branch tag as the key. > > Take the following scenario

Re: [fossil-users] clearsign, so what

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Leo Razoumov wrote: > Looking through the fossil source code I found places where manifests > are clearsign-ed. But where are signatures verified? > > They're not. It's designed for when you're auditing check-ins (after, say, a security breach..) -B __

Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches

functionality. > > --Leo-- > > P.S. Sorry for top-posting. > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 21:32, Brian Smith (mailto:br...@linuxfood.net)> wrote: > > Hello again, > > > > Ok, so, it's not quite afternoon, but, it's still the same day. > > >

Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches

ags ? (*) Would it be useful to anyone to be able to specify something like: fossil pull --tag release=v1.0 So that you could theoretically create repositories that only track tags with specific values? That's it for now. As I put my head back into the code, I'm sure I'll come u

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

You read my mind. :) Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Stephan Beal (mailto:sgb...@googlemail.com)> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Brian Smith

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Brian Smith (mailto:br...@linuxfood.net)> wrote: > > I haven't spent any time with the JSON API, but, a very quick thought: > > > > It's possible for a check-

Re: [fossil-users] feature proposal: explicitly public branches

ctize limsync? > > > > > > Going by what Brian Smith has written, it's a question of having time > > do work on it and handling a few special cases. > > > > Brian, if you need any kind of assistance, please let us know. I > > really want th

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

I haven't spent any time with the JSON API, but, a very quick thought: It's possible for a check-in to have more than one parent. I assume you model that. Would it be worth while to change "parentUuid" to "parents" for the sake of consistency with the "tags" attribute? -B On Wednesday, Febru

Re: [fossil-users] Derived code, not to be pushed public

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Leo Razoumov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:15, Brian Smith wrote: >> For what it's worth, I was working on limited branch syncing awhile back. >> >> I never got around to merging it back into the master fossil repo, but, I >>

Re: [fossil-users] Derived code, not to be pushed public

For what it's worth, I was working on limited branch syncing awhile back. I never got around to merging it back into the master fossil repo, but, I think at least your use case is functional.. http://code.linuxfood.net/pub/repo/fossil-limsync I really ought to finish that up and push it into th

Re: [fossil-users] Authentication via URL

It works because it's not sent as HTTP Basic when cloning. Fossil sends it in it's own 'Card' format. The password is sent hashed and nonced (though I forget the exact details of the exchange.) Which means it's actually a bit better than Basic authentication. -B On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:38 AM,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil Repository Does Not Exist Error

There's a "test-move-repository" command that does just this. Perhaps it should be promoted to a proper command. On Oct 28, 2011 8:49 AM, "Konstantin Khomoutov" < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:00:41 -0700 > Matt Welland wrote: > > > I usually open the _FOSSIL_ fi

Re: [fossil-users] limited push/pull/clone/sync operations (Was: Re: feature list?)

but, I'm tossing it out there. I suppose it could be used administratively to make sure that dead branches don't get reopened without good reason. Ok, time for sleep, -B On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > If I understand you correctly, > > Such a feature w

Re: [fossil-users] feature list?

If I understand you correctly, Such a feature would seem to be very difficult to implement in fossil, since fossil records that information as tags on commits and doing that would necessitate either rewriting history (bad!), or to rewrite the information as its being unpacked and leave it unmodifi

Re: [fossil-users] delete a branch

http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/branching.wiki On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Erlis Vidal wrote: > Hi all, > > thanks for the answers, maybe I'm approaching fossil from the git side. > Maybe I have a misconception. In Git a branch is just a pointer to a given > commit, removing t

Re: [fossil-users] Testing for a release

I read a paper awhile back that talked about the minimum distance necessary being 40 something, but I believe that eas in ciexyz colorspace. On Aug 26, 2011 12:39 PM, "Joshua Paine" wrote: > On 8/26/2011 3:11 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: >> It *could* be a feature, not a bug.. I mean.. if 2 branches h

Re: [fossil-users] UnQL?

If you read the second link that Stephan provided you'll find that Fossil may use SQLite as it's backing store, but it's actually a distributed NoSQL database in it's operation. -B On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Brian Cottingham wrote: > You sure jumped on that story fast! > > I'm not Dr. Hipp

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil not removing files when switching branches

I might suggest amending the help command to list commonly used commands by default, and a new switch --all that will display the uncommon ones (such as close). -B On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Joshua Paine wrote: > On 7/13/2011 3:45 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> My recommendation is that you ne

Re: [fossil-users] is it possible, using th1, to set/expand variables in wiki pages?

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Ron Wilson wrote: >> >> Are you asking how to update all your wiki pages, or just replace the >> markers when a wiki page is displayed? > > Just to replace them. e.g. at the top of the page (or in my header,

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

FWIW, that's what my perl script did before fossil got it's own implementation. Kept online here for historical interests. -B On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> On

Re: [fossil-users] Deploying A Web Application with Fossil and FTP

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:44:18 -0800 > Brian Smith wrote: > >> For some personal sites, what I do is I actually have the fossil repo >> opened in the web directory. >> It's .htaccess'd off so that you c

Re: [fossil-users] Deploying A Web Application with Fossil and FTP

For some personal sites, what I do is I actually have the fossil repo opened in the web directory. It's .htaccess'd off so that you can't get at it, even if you know it's there. Then, I've got a cronjob that once every 15 minutes does a 'fossil update release'. Where 'release' is just a tag that I

Re: [fossil-users] ticket lists over json working

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Sorry for all the noise tonight/this morning, but i'm on a hacking high... > > How's this for tickets info? > > stephan@ludo:~/cvs/fossil/fossil-sgb$ ./fossil tick list reports > Available reports: > report number    report title > 0    full t

Re: [fossil-users] demo of jsonized timeline

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Brian Smith wrote: >> >> Absolutely. I hope I wasn't coming off as belligerent. I like the >> half-way compromise. > > LOL! By no means did you come across as belligerent. >

Re: [fossil-users] demo of jsonized timeline

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Brian Smith wrote: >> >> My point in all this being that having the column list seems >> unnecessary. Adding in output for a small >> minority of users/usecases doesn'

Re: [fossil-users] demo of jsonized timeline

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Brian Smith wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Stephan Beal >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Joshua Paine >> > wrote: >>

Re: [fossil-users] demo of jsonized timeline

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Joshua Paine > wrote: >> >> Your format is certainly lighter over the wire, but it's very much not >> how users of JSON generally do things and expect things to work. I think >> it's worth some bytes to be un

Re: [fossil-users] Extending Tcl idea

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Eric wrote: > On Tue, October 26, 2010 at 7:52pm, "Bruce Chidester" > wrote: > >> I noticed while using the TH1 language that I did not have access to all >> of >> the Tcl primitives. >> >> When I looked in the source code, it appeared that the Tcl was being >> p

Re: [fossil-users] New TH1 command: wikicontent

t_out "${accept_out}\n * Signed off by: ${out}" ** } ** puts [wiki $accept_out] ** */ On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Wolfgang wrote: >> Brian Smith writes: >> >>  : >>> TH1 usage: 'w

Re: [fossil-users] New TH1 command: wikicontent

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Wolfgang wrote: > Brian Smith writes: > >  : >> TH1 usage: 'wikicontent WIKIPAGE_NAME FALLBACK_TEXT' >> >> The command returns the contents of a wiki page (presently, only real >> wiki pages, not embedded docs), >

[fossil-users] New TH1 command: wikicontent

Hi All, Found that I had a need to prepopulate the 'new ticket comment' field with a template. I considered inlining the text directly into the template page and using a conditional, but found that didn't quite work for my purposes (namely, that I wanted non-administators to be able to edit the te

Re: [fossil-users] Multiple repo setup getting "Internal Server Error" on Linux

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Joshua Paine wrote: > On 09/23/2010 01:42 PM, Arnel Legaspi wrote: >> Dr. Hipp, some of our developer guys wanted me to ask if there are any >> plans in the future to create anything that would allow them to convert >> Subversion repos over to Fossil. Are there an

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix SSL cert query problem...

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Wes Freeman wrote: >> >> It still happens to me on the current release. There is an open ticket >> here: >> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/727af73f46 >> >> Wes > > I would welcome patches from

Re: [fossil-users] user/pass login with https?

Pulling this back onto the original thread. On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Michael Schlenker > wrote: >> >> Am 09.09.2010 um 16:03 schrieb Richard Hipp: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 a

Re: [fossil-users] user/pass login with https?

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Michael Schlenker wrote: > > Am 09.09.2010 um 16:03 schrieb Richard Hipp: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:48 AM, James Peverill >> wrote: >> On 09/09/2010 09:26 AM, fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org wrote: >> > Fossil never generates a 401 error.  The

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: ssh:// sync method

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > The latest version of Fossil (in the self-hosting Fossil repository - not > the precompiled binaries which are a little too old) supports a new method > of pushing, pulling, cloning, and syncing using SSH.  Examples: > > fossil clone ssh:

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] Reimplementation of the reconstruct command that went missing

Hi, I've created the following ticket for this patch: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/dfe1fc608a Thanks, -B On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > During the move from GPL to BSD, the 'reconstruct' command went missing. > I assum

[fossil-users] [PATCH] Reimplementation of the reconstruct command that went missing

Hi All, During the move from GPL to BSD, the 'reconstruct' command went missing. I assume this was due to licensing issues. I've re-implemented it, since, my git-import tool depends on it. This implementation is "black box". I've not examined the original source for reconstruct at all. At the mom

Re: [fossil-users] Features request

I don't actually believe it does. IIRC, it just simply calls out to $PAGER. -B On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Richter wrote: > On 30 June 2010 21:24, Joshua Paine wrote: >> >> On 06/30/2010 01:52 AM, Ruslan Popov wrote: >> > When I use git I like its feature to do 'more' showing huge

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH!] SSL verify fails on centos when there's an intermediate certificate involved

ake it into mainline - regardless of who produces such a solution or how it's implemented. Thanks, -B On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:09 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > >> Not to be impatient, just wanted to clarify that there is a patch to &

[fossil-users] [PATCH!] SSL verify fails on centos when there's an intermediate certificate involved

Not to be impatient, just wanted to clarify that there is a patch to fix the issue described here. -B On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > With the patch from ticket > <http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/45f89e504b>, bare SSL > syncing no

[fossil-users] SSL verify fails on centos when there's an intermediate certificate involved

Hi All, With the patch from ticket , bare SSL syncing now works properly with self-signed certificates. However, Fossil doesn't load the system certificate store on Centos/linux (and probably other *nix type platforms as well). Which means that

Re: [fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil repositories do not normally need to be "vacuumed".  The > exception is when they have been newly constructed such as by clone - > which vacuums automatically, or by the Git import tool.  (Does that > Git import tool vacuum the reposi

Re: [fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

Just a quick update. I had a spare hour or so, so, I extended it to support tags. I'm still looking to see about branches. Thanks, -B On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Brian Smith wrote: > I've not used svn in ages, but if the need/want arises I might take a > stab at it. :) &g

Re: [fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

I've not used svn in ages, but if the need/want arises I might take a stab at it. :) IMO, the easiest way to handle svn repos is to just require a certain layout for the repository. I'm aware of another tool or two that do that. And, if you're in possession of one of those "multiple project" svn re

[fossil-users] Look! A git import tool.

Hi All, I've been playing with fossil for a few weeks now and I've come to quite like it. I was a tad disappointed that a git import tool hadn't been written so, I went ahead and did that. You can find the tool at: https://code.linuxfood.net/pub/repo/git-import/home (please accept the self-signed