On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:47:44 +, C. Thomas Stover wrote:
> On the other hand this may be more of a file system specific issue
> rather than an OS specific one.
for clarity's sake, this is wrong. I just found the discussion about this
over in sqlite-users. AIX simply doe
uld say just doing the above test would be
perfectly acceptable.
--
C. Thomas Stover
www.thomasstover.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:40:39 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM, C. Thomas Stover
>
>> On AIX 7.1, I get the following SQLite error on a open (jfs2 file
>> system):
>>
>> /usr/local/bin/fossil: SQLITE_IOERR: os_unix.c:28318: (9) fsyn
--disable-internal-sqlite
./configure --CFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include" --LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib -
lsqlite3" ./configure --disable-internal-sqlite
My work around has been a kludge with running fossil on a Linux system
with sshfs + symlinks, but maybe there a chance this is f
irst test replying to a thread from the newsreader
side.)
--
C. Thomas Stover
www.thomasstover.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
how feasible it would be to use some server
side code for syntax highlighting.
--
C. Thomas Stover
www.thomasstover.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil
Drop me line off list some day about retro-computing.
--
C. Thomas Stover
www.thomasstover.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
meday someone will create a tool to fill in the gap. Sort of a DVCS
style metadata logging and control facility to a rsync style
technology. Kind of like some of the interpretations of "distributed
file system" back in the plan 9 lineage of thought for instance.
C. Thomas Stover
www.t
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:55:09 -0600
Carson Chittom wrote:
> "C. Thomas Stover" writes:
>
> > Well if hardcopy means scanned paper (no ocr) then it sounds like a
> > very large binary file set.
>
> I'm showing my ignorance, but does OCR matter in this ca
ncept is sound. Report
back on how it goes in practice.
--
C. Thomas Stover
www.thomasstover.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
ce. Regardless of what efforts are expended otherwise, the
result will always be failure. This I have learned is just a reality of
the universe in which we live.
--
C. Thomas Stover
www.thomasstover.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lis
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:27:03 -0700
Matt Welland wrote:
> One partial solution available today is to use http://chiselapp.com.
> Simply use their "clone repo" feature with regular pull.
What exactly does that do over a regular clone & pull?
--
www.thomasstover.com
_
t sort of steps
would make it ok to say "hey folks check out fossil hack, it's up on a
cloned repo at url abc". Even if one was in the position of a regular
contributor, they still might want to do something like this as sort of
a "public private branch" in between contrib
option.
--
C. Thomas Stover
Stover Enterprises, LLC
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Is there some way to push just a specific branch to a server other than
the private branch feature? For example branch A and B are both stored
locally, and are both pushed to server 1, yet only branch B is pushed
to server 2.
___
fossil-users mailing lis
to a doc folder or something.
--
C. Thomas Stover
Stover Enterprises, LLC
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
16 matches
Mail list logo
