Re: [fossil-users] No rule to make target 'src/email.c', ...

Nice quick fix. Compiles now. Thanks. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 10:03 AM Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/21/18, Eric Dillon wrote: > > Fails to compile on Win32 VS2013 (12.0) > > > > email.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _popen referenced > in > > function

Re: [fossil-users] No rule to make target 'src/email.c', ...

Fails to compile on Win32 VS2013 (12.0) email.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _popen referenced in function _email_send On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, 3:51 PM Florian Balmer wrote: > Richard Hipp: > > > It is reassuring to know that so many people routinely build Fossil > > from the trun

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 121, Issue 9

>From "fossil ui", go to "admin > settings". In diff-command put the path and executable name for winmerge. My winmerge is a portable installation, so my diff-command is set as ... C:\bin\winmerge-2.14.0\winmergeu.exe Works great. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018, 1:30 PM wrote: > I love WinMerge and was

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017, 12:19 PM Richard Hipp wrote: And it should now be fixed on trunk. > Verified. Thanks. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

Here's a bisect of the error on Windows. 11:39:32 $ fo bisect good bisect complete 2 BAD 2017-08-21 12:18:49 810dd031ec3ee1d6 5 BAD 2017-08-12 18:24:29 9eea719af68932ad 6 BAD 2017-08-12 18:20:26 9690d370e0714a43 7 BAD 2017-08-12 18:15:36 3b191c984b831571 8 GOOD2017-08

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

Here is the error generated in Windows. Works correctly without the --to parameter. 10:19:38 $ fo gdiff --from d5b015 --to 810dd0 Index: src/http_transport.c == the [C:\Users\xx\AppData\Local\Temp\/src/http_transport.c-v1-6pCA381

Re: [fossil-users] Purging data from Fossil

the trimmed content gets written into a > separate "trash-can" database? > You might consider this from the converse perspective, allowing 'fossil export' to a new fossil repo, but specifying some sort of complex boolean selector on export. Then you at least get the

Re: [fossil-users] Weird cross-contamination between two fossil repositories (and not even talking to server!)

> On May 27, 2016, at 12:26, Andy Gibbs wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just had a very, very odd experience with fossil. I'm running version > 1.34. > > Let me first explain what I have done. > > I cloned a respository off our server. I then went into the clone's web UI > and disabled the auto-

Re: [fossil-users] Conversation with a CM guy

here's a market of at least 1 team that would love a Fossil plugin for Eclipse. It would be ironic if Fossil's killer use case wound up being its support of a best-of-breed IDE plugin. Fossil's original author is definitely not a big IDE guy. :-) Eric __

Re: [fossil-users] Conversation with a CM guy

rong things, but let's not base decisions in our current project around the industry's silly hiring practices. My $0.02, Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

to code by speech, eventually becoming faster that way than he had been with two healthy hands. Perhaps you'd be interested in checking out his methods. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SkdfdXWYaI Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Rewrite of fossil-v-git.wiki. Was: Fossil mentioned on HN

in JSON: https://confluence.atlassian.com/jira/importing-data-from-json-495976468.html So if you follow that form, then you get your Jira export capability for free. :-) Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Rewrite of fossil-v-git.wiki. Was: Fossil mentioned on HN

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > > > > Providing an outbound export interface to at least one such tool > > Which one? I count over 40 in the Wikipedia list: > > https://en.wikipedia.o

Re: [fossil-users] Rewrite of fossil-v-git.wiki. Was: Fossil mentioned on HN

not, it is again irrelevant to my claim that Fossil's ticket system is not, in fact, easy to migrate away from. Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] allow downloading wiki page attachments for users without Read permission

A user with the following permission flags: bcfhjkmnprtw for a site in which the virtual users Reader, Developer, Anonymous and Nobody have no default privileges, cannot download an attachment directly from a wiki page attachments list. The list points to URIs such as this one: https://www.exam

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

I'll just hope that you realize the depth of your error before the next time the topic comes back up. :-) Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil does not generate https link prefix

fossil/my.fossil.db --https --host www.example.com For completeness, here is the redirect rule to expose stunnel at port 443 (allowing stunnel to run as user 'fossil' rather than 'root'): # iptables -t nat -nvL Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 31728 pa

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

when symlinks are present. This is (from my perspective) a very different issue, but you nevertheless may want to track it. Also, I did not read every detail in the thread ("xkcd on git") that led to this subtopic, so perhaps people aired other sym

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > > > > (1) Default allow-symlinks to true > > (2) Fix bug in which the allow-symlinks setting is not honored while > > opening a repository > > > > Please try the latest

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > > > > (2) Fix bug in which the allow-symlinks setting is not honored while > > opening a repository > > > > Did the following changes (a while back) not address this? > >

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

ering opinions on the changes needed (i.e. and not just > whether or not there should be any changes in the current behavior)? > So far this thread has not reached such a stage, afaik. Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

. Fossil already sort-of attempts to do what Git does, it just has some bugs and incorrect default config values. So the distance to fixing Fossil is quite small. But closing the gap (and keeping it closed) is much harder when a vocal subset of the community argues that supporting symlinks is

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith > wrote: > >> the user when trying to move a tarball from one OS to another. In other >> words, I believe that you perceive a dichotomy that is false (between

[fossil-users] symlinks (was Re: xkcd on git)

e user base.) For context, my particular use case: we need the openssl source tree in our project, and that tree contains internal symlinks. Again, people have to jump through silly hoops to get new repos set up properly, because fossil breaks those symlinks by populating new repos with flat te

[fossil-users] xkcd on git

I suspect Fossil folks will appreciate this :-) http://xkcd.com/1597/ Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] merge after cherrypick plus edit does not identify GCA as I would like

roblem that I haven't considered. In my initial example, if the cherry-picks were considered then the 'beta' leaf would be the GCA for my test file, so the merge would be a trivial one (simply take the current 'trunk' leaf as the new file data). Eric __

Re: [fossil-users] merge after cherrypick plus edit does not identify GCA as I would like

> The merge algorithm does *not* consider cherry-picks. It looks for > the most recent common ancestor without taking cherry-picks into > account. Another popular version control tool whose name I won't mention (hint: rhymes with "zit") behaves identically to fossil in this scenario. Is there s

[fossil-users] merge after cherrypick plus edit does not identify GCA as I would like

See the transcript below for gory details. The summary is: 1. create a new file on trunk and check it in. 2. edit the file and check in on a branch (let's call it "beta") 3. trunk decides it wants that particular change set from step (2), so cherrypick it (assume in this example that other stuff

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > -LIB = -m32 -L1/lib -lssl -lcrypto -lz -ldl -lm > +LIB = -m32 -L1/lib /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.a > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a -lz -ldl -lm > I suppose this is sexier: LIB = -m32 -L1/lib -Wl,-static -l

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > > > Eric: Can you discover what apt-get is needed in order to statically >> link libssl using -m32? >> > > Perhaps this? > > # apt-get install libssl-dev:i386 > > Warning: I just got that comman

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

> Eric: Can you discover what apt-get is needed in order to statically > link libssl using -m32? > Perhaps this? # apt-get install libssl-dev:i386 Warning: I just got that command line from google and verified apt-get accepted it -- didn't actually try to link against the libs i

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/10/15, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > >> On 6/10/15, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > >> > > >> > If you are worried that some people

Re: [fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/10/15, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > > > > If you are worried that some people don't want the bloat of openssl in > > their base fossil, perhaps provide both options on the site? > > > > It's

[fossil-users] please compile official fossil builds with https support

$ fossil pull Pull from https://eas@<...>/ HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support Pull done, sent: 0 received: 0 ip: $ This burdens adoption, since now I have to build my own fossil and distribute that to people on my team internally, rather than just pointing them at the web site.

[fossil-users] minor: broken hyperlink in fossil web site

>From the download page for v1.33, "Improved ability to customize the timelime graph " is a broken link. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/ma

[fossil-users] fossil http -h causes a segfault

Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix parallel timeline

gram or an inexperienced student with 5 volts of coffee onboard at 2am... Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix parallel timeline

> Are you sure your students didn't "shun" something or try to use > "reconstruct"? > What would happen if the student tried to push a repo that they had created with 'fossil init' to the central clone? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fo

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

a fix for that in here:-) Maybe I'm missing sub-cases, but the key thing is that I expect Fossil to do the filesystem 'rm' or 'mv' for me if it's safe to do so. And I think Fossil can preserve backward compat even if extended in this way, right? Eric [1] Consider fir

Re: [fossil-users] proposed patch: symlinks appear as regular files even when allow-symlinks is on

r* zCont = blob_str(&content); + for(i=0; i<4 && zCont[i]!=0 && zCont[i]!='\n';++i ){ zValue[i]=zCont[i]; } + g.allowSymlinks = is_truth(zValue); +} if( file_is_the_same(&content, zName) ){ blob_reset(&content); if( file_wd_setexe(zName, is

Re: [fossil-users] proposed patch: symlinks appear as regular files even when allow-symlinks is on

epos], ".fossil-settings/allow-symlinks")==0 +){ + char zValue[4] = {0,0,0,0}; + int i=0; + bSawSymlinkSetting = 1; + const char* zCont = blob_str(&content); + while( i<3 && zCont[i]!=0 && zCont[i]!='\n' ){zValue[i]=zCont[i];

Re: [fossil-users] Larger diff possible?

ese days, that "zooms in" the whole page while trying to keep things in relative proportion. You can "zoom back out" by holding down Control and hitting the Minus key "-". -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networks, Inc. http://aterlo.com _

[fossil-users] proposed patch: symlinks appear as regular files even when allow-symlinks is on

sil open ../test .fossil-settings/allow-symlinks a b project-name: repository: /home/eas/tmp/fstest/sandbox3/../test local-root: /home/eas/tmp/fstest/sandbox3/ config-db:/home/eas/.fossil project-code: 981a44330154ce354fc1407af51b2ccaaacf1440 checkout:

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

erlying cause of the error to propagate back to the client, not a 'harmless' parse error on a file that is not a manifest. But that is just my vague understanding: obviously Richard can comment more intelligently on that than I can. -- Eric A. Rub

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

from my TH1 hooks. I.e. Fossil itself is no longer implicated as a contributing cause. I'll keep pulling on that thread in private, since it now seems it is specific to my particular deployment. Many thanks to Richard and Stephen for looking into it and making the improvement to the

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

Stephan Beal wrote: > You mention custom changes with regards to push scripts, which make me > curious about that error message: i can find "push script failed" nowhere > in fossil. Where is it coming from (if you know)? The strings are escaped :) eric@dev:~/Fossil-5ff4e33617

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > $ fossil push > Push to https://eas@:10444/ > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 2 received: 0 > Error: push script failed: syntax error in manifest > [449bc674c3fc9c036db0d4dc71281b7cb900fe7d] > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 2 received: 0 > Push

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

sh script failed: syntax error in manifest [449bc674c3fc9c036db0d4dc71281b7cb900fe7d] Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 2 received: 0 Push finished with 818173 bytes sent, 385 bytes received $ -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networks, Inc. http://aterlo.com __

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

Richard Hipp wrote: > Can you try compiling the tip of the "better-error-msgs" branch and put > that on your server, then let us know what the new error message is? Our emails crossed paths. I'll do as you suggest and let you know what happens. -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

ges. It may be that this is my fault, not Fossil's. I would like to eliminate that possibility myself, for fear that I am wasting your time on an issue that does not affect anyone but me. What is a good fossil trunk version for me to re-test with? -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networ

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

;) than the sync logic itself? Let me know if you would like to see that TH1 script. Eric -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networks, Inc. http://aterlo.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cg

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

part 0090 79 2F 4D 61 6B 65 66 69 6C 65 20 34 31 61 32 65 y/Makefile 41a2e No 0Ds in there. Let me re-send you the manifest as a 'gz' file. Hopefully no code between me and you will be too clever for its own good this time. -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networks, Inc. http://a

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

received: 0 Sync finished with 1635485 bytes sent, 5536 bytes received $ Trying again works: $ fossil sync Sync with https://eas@:10444/ Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 2 Sync finished with 817713 bytes sent, 3415 bytes received $

Re: [fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

ed771618b7679edb469e9d63e45f94685 fossil@dev:~/sandbox$ fossil test-parse-manifest ./manifest fossil@dev:~/sandbox$ echo $? 0 I'd be happy to share the whole manifest privately, but I'm not sure how much it will help. -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networks, Inc. http://aterlo.com ___

[fossil-users] push fails with complaint about manifest syntax error

I haven't changed much recently about my repository topology. One central "master" repo that I push to from my "dev" repo. No one else is doing any pushing. The master repo has hooks set up for publishing my commits etc to a remote HTTP REST API. The only change I made recently is to open up my

[fossil-users] minor bug on export to git

When exporting to git, the check-in comments that are exported are the original comments. If you had subsequently edited the comments, then those edits are not retained during the export. Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

stripped, so doesn't appear to have > any symbols A stripped shared library would not be worth much, since the whole point of a shared library is to provide symbols. Did you pass '-D'? -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ fossil-users mailing l

Re: [fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

" for deciding that SSL is supported on the build box using the dir your specify. Did you confirm that all those are true in your case? -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil <-> JIRA hooks

omizable. Suggestions are of course welcomed, and > if there's a concrete case you or Eric have in mind, i can probably say > whether it's currently workable or estimate what it would take to make it > so. If we assume for a moment that the user is willing to customize t

Re: [fossil-users] fossil <-> JIRA hooks

and-alone entity. Fossil devs'/users' criticisms of git in itself are pretty well documented on this forum and elsewhere, and my intention was not to rehash that thinking on this thread. Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.

Re: [fossil-users] fossil <-> JIRA hooks

otes or code anywhere that you can point me to? -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networks, Inc. http://aterlo.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil <-> JIRA hooks

hether anyone has tried to bite off hooking up a fossil->jira feed using that API yet, whether they experienced any robustness problems or other gotchas in the JIRA API, etc. -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith Aterlo Networks, Inc. http://aterlo.com ___ fossi

[fossil-users] fossil <-> JIRA hooks

Does anyone have any experience with hooking up fossil to JIRA? Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] late-night Fossil hacks for competition with Git: arranging an active feed of commits and tickets to a remote HTTP API

ooks features to permit an automated, bidirectional incremental sync between git and fossil repositories, which might help ease some users' transitions from git to fossil (possibly encouraging more fossil uptake). -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ foss

[fossil-users] late-night Fossil hacks for competition with Git: arranging an active feed of commits and tickets to a remote HTTP API

a file transmitted from the server. */ if( blob_eq(&xfer.aToken[0],"file") ){ -xfer_accept_file(&xfer, (syncFlags & SYNC_CLONE)!=0); +xfer_accept_file(&xfer, (syncFlags & SYNC_CLONE)!=0, 0, 0); nArtifactRcvd++; }else

Re: [fossil-users] edits to ticket table not synchronized with 'fossil config pull all'

Works like a charm -- thank you sir! -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] edits to ticket table not synchronized with 'fossil config pull all'

fossil pull I have seen this every time I have tried to add a column to the tickets table. I normally work around it by copy-pasting the ticket definitions, but that is probably not going to be acceptable for my other users. Am I doing something wrong? Eric

Re: [fossil-users] symlinks

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith > wrote: > >> Any plan to support symlinks any time soon? >> >> > ??? > > [stephan@host:~]$ f help set | grep -C3 sym >access-log If e

[fossil-users] symlinks

Any plan to support symlinks any time soon? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] crash while running 'fossil pull' on Linux

Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > > On 8/18/2014 19:39, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > > > >> > >> warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error. > >> > > That looks like a corrup

[fossil-users] crash while running 'fossil pull' on Linux

uot;show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /home/eric/fossil-src-20140612172556/fossil...done. warning: exec fi

Re: [fossil-users] How to export ala CVS?

and time, and the artifact ID of the check-in. == Or if you are talking to the web service, you can do this: wget localhost:8080/tarball/foo.tgz?uuid=VERSION (where I think VERSION can be a tag name too). -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ fossil-users mailin

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

of a DVCS called "fossil". The devs know about Git of course so they wrote a Git-specific export tool. I don't need to know what fossil's schema is, nor the import format of git, to use the tool. > I don't think you're going to

Re: [fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

usly be preferable to whatever my sad little user-brain could generate. I make no claim that writing such a thing would be the best use of the fossil devs' time -- again, just wondering what is out there. > We do low-ceremony code review on SQLite. {snip} > We

[fossil-users] fossil vs git-based arrangements. code review and ticket export

are good and (b) support fossil? (3) Are there clever work-flows using native fossil features that more closely resemble proper code review tools than the sort of bad one that I sketched above? Thanks! Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] slow commit

sqlite3 > > write mode (and maybe it's not). > > OK. Maybe try this? fossil setting repo-cksum off Then re-test. -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

ably not too hard to add yourself. And DRH's code is pretty fun to hack against, as many here will attest to. :-) -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

osed-ness of a branch. Under this model, you'd picture every check-in you've tagged under your versioning scheme as a "locked" thing, since you're being careful not to reuse your version tags and since in Fossil the check-ins themselves are immutable. -- Eric A. Rubin

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

clear that the behavior OP complains about is intentional: regardless of whether the new check-in goes to a different branch, the new check-in is a direct descendant of the closed leaf. Probably the OP should just re-open the leaf and commit against it. -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___

Re: [fossil-users] fossil CLI tricks: interrupting a commit message

write my check-in comment in terminal 1 while looking at my diff in terminal 2. I must be one of those millennials with their newfangled contraptions and their damn music. -- Eric A. Rubin-Smith ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Sometimes fossil doesn't sync properly

It may be that you need to replace the "one giant file" in the below scenario with "a great many files that as a whole take up a lot of bytes". I don't remember. Sorry. :-/ On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > I believe I have seen this is

Re: [fossil-users] Sometimes fossil doesn't sync properly

I believe I have seen this issue. It's been a while, but here is the scenario as far as I can recollect: 1. Assume there are three repo copies in a "master/client" topology: M, C1, and C2. M is the master, and C1/C2 are clones of the master (meaning that C1 and C2 don't know about each

Re: [fossil-users] autosync from GUI

ave, so that you could also report to the user that a pull is necessary. But the devs will likely find that idea distasteful?) Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] autosync from GUI

Is it reasonable to ask that the 'autosync' setting cause artifacts created from the GUI to also be autosynced? I know this would likely increase the latency of the GUI, and would possibly create a series of error cases and/or user interactions that do not need to be handled in the GUI today. But

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

I have a request. Can you guys do the official builds SSL-enabled? On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014/1/11 Richard Hipp : > > I don't think this should hinder the release. > > That's great news. So the valgrind error in the /tar page and > the two failing test-cases (wh

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jan Jurak wrote: > Dear developers, > > First thank you for nice piece of software. I am using fossil for some > of my projects and some users wants more featured ticket system. For > example spent time for solving the issue. What is your opinion on > that. I am t

Re: [fossil-users] commit signing

ell-defined model, arranged as a tree: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Disk-Encryption-HOWTO/introduction.html#ThreatModel Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] commit signing

ges -- again because it could be used to subvert their PGP rendering scheme. See http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html and search for "allow_ansi". You might be able to cure the issue by rendering the the indicator in a way that a user cannot affect directly. Eric __

Re: [fossil-users] getting fossil timeline to show time offsets

In TCC (a CMD replacement for windows), I use the following where %_unixtime is a variable representing the current time. echo insert into config (name,value,mtime) values ("timeline-utc",0,%_unixtime); | fossil sql From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-boun...@l

Re: [fossil-users] fossil silently ignores capitalized ticket table field names

complish that, or should I start hacking up a script? Thanks, Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] fossil silently ignores capitalized ticket table field names

I spent a couple hours hunting for a bug in which fossil does not properly apply changes to my custom fields to the ticket table. The root cause appears to be these lines from cgi.c's add_param_list(): if( fossil_islower(zName[0]) ){ cgi_set_parameter_nocopy(zName, zValue); } =

[fossil-users] rebasing dev branches

er than a direct child of the trunk. So, is there a specific reason (e.g. some technical consideration I am missing) that the fossil devs rebase using the first method? Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.

[fossil-users] merging and file names: help text is wrong and conflicts are not reported

t find anything open for that. I noticed a related ticket here[1], however, which I think is no longer valid and can be closed. Eric [1] http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=67176c3aa4 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.f

Re: [fossil-users] fossil commit is extremely slow

On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Andy Bradford < amb-sendok-1377550706.oeilkncbciakkppah...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said Eric Rubin-Smith on Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:31:46 -0400: > > > I tested this basic claim and do not believe it holds: > > > > [monk:~] $ head -c

Re: [fossil-users] fossil commit is extremely slow

On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >>> What's the total size of all those files (how big is the checkout)?

Re: [fossil-users] fossil commit is extremely slow

l 8095 What's the total size of all those files (how big is the checkout)? > [monk:repo.fossil] $ du -sch . 392M. 392Mtotal > Is the repository or the check-out on a network filesystem? > No and no. Eric ___ fossil-users mailin

[fossil-users] fossil commit is extremely slow

xperts can help me? Thanks, Eric === processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 127 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor LE-1640 stepping: 2 cpu MHz : 1000.000 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug

Re: [fossil-users] Ingest CVS repo + cvstrac tickets into fossil?

ecommendations or code you can share before I go start hacking on the sql tables directly (which of course I'd prefer to avoid)? Eric ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] cvs to git to fossil does not preserve user names on check-ins

I exported my CVS repo to git using cvs2git (version 2.4.0-dev), and ingested the resulting git repo into fossil according to the instructions on the fossil web site, using fossil 1.26. My git version is 1.7.7.6. This failed to preserve the original CVS user names. The reason is that git assumes

Re: [fossil-users] admin pages are empty and have bad titles

way, the "--https" argument there is required to prevent fossil from thinking that it should not authenticate the user. Eric On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Andy Bradford < amb-sendok-137730.cdeapjlkdpclmgfol...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said Eric Rubin-Smith on Wed, 2

  1   2   3   >