e for that, which is Google Groups, and it does not require
self‑hosting.
--
Yannick Duchêne
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
list, and if it cannot be resolved there, then one of
> the maintainers will create the ticket.
I hope it's not entirely my fault: I remember one or two years ago I submitted
four tickets successively, and three of those were immediately deleted (the
fourth one were kept).
it was a forum instead.
--
Yannick Duchêne
pgpb4EwDtB2Oq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:47:08 +0100
Yannick Duchêne wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:41:12 +0100
> Yannick Duchêne wrote:
>
> > Will have a test to see it gives the behaviour I wish to get.
>
> Not good, now `fossil gdiff` complains “cannot compute difference between
>
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:41:12 +0100
Yannick Duchêne wrote:
> Will have a test to see it gives the behaviour I wish to get.
Not good, now `fossil gdiff` complains “cannot compute difference between
symlink and regular file”.
--
Yannick Duch
there are places where
on the opposite, I would like Fossil to know a directory entry is to be a
symbolic link.
--
Yannick Duchêne
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
known way to workaround this?
Or maybe I don't properly use symbolic links with Fossil?
--
Yannick Duchêne
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
.
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:31:44 +0100
Yannick Duchêne wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I though the “Older” link in the HTML UI, was like a “next page” link.
>
> Doing fine grained commits (I'm afraid of doing something wrong), I have many
> commits on something I started to versio
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:58:56 +0100
Yannick Duchêne wrote:
>
> The “Newer” link does not behave the same, it does not forgot anything. So at
> least “Newer” and “Older” are not symmetric.
>
Finally not, it forgot newer entries :-/ It does not find entries newer than
that of 2016
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:16:46 -0500
Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 1/16/16, Yannick Duchêne wrote:
> > Hi people,
> >
> > I though the “Older” link in the HTML UI, was like a “next page” link.
>
> That's what it is suppose to do.
So it was not an erroneous assumptio
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:31:44 +0100
Yannick Duchêne wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I though the “Older” link in the HTML UI, was like a “next page” link.
>
> Doing fine grained commits (I'm afraid of doing something wrong), I have many
> commits on something I started to versio
at other places
too.
--
Yannick Duchêne
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Except `checkout` fails if there are edited files, is there any big difference
between `revert` and `checkout`?
Also, what is the purpose of `checkout --keep`? What would be an example
use‑case?
--
Yannick Duchêne
___
fossil-users mailing list
I received a spam from `nella_br...@expertisetour.xyz` with subject “RE:
[fossil-users] What does the Older button's intended to do in the web UI?”. So
it appears a spammer subscribed to this mailing list, intercepts messages and
replies to it, which is confusing.
--
Yannick Du
, but it's the same with the default theme.
--
Yannick Duchêne
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
15 matches
Mail list logo
