Re: [fossil-users] ilegible stash listing

2016-05-14 Thread fran
[CHANGETSET] on DATE expresses just that? 2016-05-14 16:05 GMT-03:00 Andy Bradford <amb-sendok-1465844713.agifdcgjaeeehdnkp...@bradfords.org>: > Thus said fran on Fri, 13 May 2016 03:58:44 -0300: > >> You mention the context. What context? > > The context is the con

Re: [fossil-users] ilegible stash listing

2016-05-13 Thread fran
the same, you are used to the listing formatting but its incorrectly worded, given the real context (the structure) [STASHID]:[CHANGESET] on DATE should be [STASHID] on DATE based on [CHANGESET] 2016-05-10 10:54 GMT-03:00 Andy Bradford <amb-sendok-1465480459.dleobohfkmddegdnc...@bradfords.org>

Re: [fossil-users] Request for different behavior with adding files in nested fossils

2016-05-07 Thread fran
Projects with *many* subrepos could serve of a feature like this to avoid "spilling" wrong code on wrong repos. That has happened to me too; *our fault* for not entering into the subrepo. Either way, one is using "subrepos" pseudofeature and this mistake will be happen again and again and again.

[fossil-users] Some more default settings for a UI user

2016-04-23 Thread Fran
add option to display unified or sidebyside patch by default too Enviado con Aquamail para Android http://www.aqua-mail.com Hi, it would be nice to have some default settings definable for a user: • Timeline view: - Type of entries (e.g. only check-ins) - Max. - With/Without

Re: [fossil-users] feature implemented or suggestion for stash

2016-04-12 Thread fran
I tried to be the more accurate I can given I am not english spoken to expose what I wanted to say in the first place. Excuse me for the extension of this but I think there is an interesting point here and a patch --- Bug fixing sometimes

Re: [fossil-users] feature implemented or suggestion for stash

2016-04-11 Thread fran
all my samples include messages. If that's the point then I could add all the 'interface' I need into the -m flag including console codes to draw boxes and stuff. 2016-04-11 13:15 GMT-03:00 Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:56 PM, fran <brauning.

Re: [fossil-users] feature implemented or suggestion for stash

2016-04-11 Thread fran
forget the command line cases. The checkout was a children of the checkout I was requesting to purge. 2016-04-11 13:45 GMT-03:00 fran <brauning...@gmail.com>: > Whats the effect if I use the --integrate option? > > 2016-04-11 13:17 GMT-03:00 Tony Papadimitriou <to...@acm.org&

Re: [fossil-users] feature implemented or suggestion for stash

2016-04-11 Thread fran
Whats the effect if I use the --integrate option? 2016-04-11 13:17 GMT-03:00 Tony Papadimitriou : > Once you’re ready to move the changes to a normal branch you simply merge > (but without the –integrate option or else the purge won’t work correctly), > and then purge the private

[fossil-users] feature implemented or suggestion for stash

2016-04-11 Thread fran
the stash could give more info about the baseline checkout. It currently shows just the checkout uuid. I never realized the presented uuid was actually the baseline. Stephan Beal said he wasn't even aware of the 'stash goto' command! And I (noob user) couldn't understand what the 'goto' would do.

Re: [fossil-users] what are vid?

2016-04-10 Thread fran
sgb...@googlemail.com>: > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:21 AM, fran <brauning...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> from the stash structure >> >> sqlite> select * from stash; >> 1|9|invierte logica de isaccepted|2457472.71413265 >> 2|18|test another -l impl