Re: [fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > >> 2) Should we consider using relative URLs instead of absolute? >> > > That sounds like it is the right solution. But it is a big change. It > will likely take a week or two to ap

Re: [fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:22:42PM +0200, Trou Macacq wrote: > About fossil server... on production (not ad hoc) this means using > inetd daemon. And I might say something stupid, but I'm almost sure it > not installed on my Ubuntu server 10.10 by default. And I trying to > keep everything as stand

Re: [fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Nathaniel R. Reindl
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > connected with HTTP_HOST env variable... And this env variable cannot > be changed either in CGI script using bash, or by using SetEnv > mod_rewreite directive. You'll want to do one of two things here: (1) You'll want to investigate how I'm

Re: [fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Trou Macacq
Hi I've tried to solve my issue by using Apache mod_env and mod_rewrite... I'm might be wrong but zBaseURL variable somehow connected with HTTP_HOST env variable... And this env variable cannot be changed either in CGI script using bash, or by using SetEnv mod_rewreite directive. About fossil ser

Re: [fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Nathaniel R. Reindl
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > My setup look like this: > > ngnix reverse proxy, port 80 <-> apache daemon running fossil via CGI, port > 8080 > > And since fossil sets absolute URL to all resources embedded... the > people outside have seem my repositories wiki, tickets, a

Re: [fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:20:02AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > > > 2) Should we consider using relative URLs instead of absolute? > > > > That sounds like it is the right solution. But it is a big change. It will > likely take a week or tw

Re: [fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote: > 2) Should we consider using relative URLs instead of absolute? > That sounds like it is the right solution. But it is a big change. It will likely take a week or two to appear. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _

[fossil-users] $baseurl question (reverse proxy issue)

2010-12-16 Thread Trou Macacq
Hi all! Thank you all for such a great tool as fossil! I've become big fan of the fossil SCM some time ago and past few days I spent finally moving fossil repositories to the production server (I need some sort of centralized hosting for all my stuff) and funny thing happened -- fossil let me dow