On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:11 AM, David Bovill wrote:
> I'd like to know more about this as well. As I understand it you can nest
> fossil repositories, I haven't tried it yet, but AFAIK you can have a
> nested checkout within an existing checkout, and you can open it with the
> "fossil open --nes
I'd like to know more about this as well. As I understand it you can nest
fossil repositories, I haven't tried it yet, but AFAIK you can have a
nested checkout within an existing checkout, and you can open it with the
"fossil open --nested" command.
2011/11/14 Jacek Cała
> Hi all,
>
> A best pr
On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Jacek Cała wrote:
> A best practice question:
> What is the preferred way to include external libraries in a fossil
> repository? I mean larger dependencies like boost.
> For small libs and tools like a few binary or source code files, I
> tend to include them directl
Hi all,
A best practice question:
What is the preferred way to include external libraries in a fossil
repository? I mean larger dependencies like boost.
For small libs and tools like a few binary or source code files, I
tend to include them directly in the repo but for larger ones it
doesn't see
4 matches
Mail list logo
