Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-05 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 4, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Martin Vahi wrote: >> It is about 4.4GiB, over 100k files, over 6k folders, >> but it should not be that bad. After all, that's what >> many projects look like in

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Karel Gardas
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > No. What repo checksum does is compute a separate checksum over the > concatenation of all files. Uf, so I've been completely off the picture. Thanks for correction! ___

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread K. Fossil user
De : Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@bec.de> À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Dimanche 4 décembre 2016 20h55 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: >

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: > >> Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a > >> lot, but then

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Karel Gardas
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: >> Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a >> lot, but then make sure you are on the filesystem like ZFS/btrfs which >> does that

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 08:50:44PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: > Otherwise as Nikita recommended, switching off repo checksums helps a > lot, but then make sure you are on the filesystem like ZFS/btrfs which > does that for you transparently and you do not need to do that on the > fossil side. Eh,

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-04 Thread Nikita Borodikhin
Try setting repo-cksum property off, it should help a lot. By default Fossil double-checks all the files on disk to make sure their contents is not changed. That's fine for a small project, but for large ones Nikita On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 8:29 PM Martin Vahi wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-03 Thread jungle boogie
On 12/03/2016 08:28 PM, Martin Vahi wrote: Reproduction: 1) Download LLVM source. It might be done by executing the bash script from http://www.softf1.com/cgi-bin/tree1/technology/flaws/mmmv_parasail_projects.bash/artifact/3a28f1fb67a5d860 2) Commit the source. It is about

[fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

2016-12-03 Thread Martin Vahi
Reproduction: 1) Download LLVM source. It might be done by executing the bash script from http://www.softf1.com/cgi-bin/tree1/technology/flaws/mmmv_parasail_projects.bash/artifact/3a28f1fb67a5d860 2) Commit the source. It is about 4.4GiB, over 100k files, over 6k folders, but it