Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-20 Thread Nolan Darilek
It isn't blindness, I'm blind and did notice the download links previously. I'm not trying to be pedantic, I just don't like seeing my disability used when someone misses the obvious and is looking for a term to use. I'm routinely treated as if I must not notice the obvious, and it's one of th

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-20 Thread K
And blindness indeed. The download option may be found in check-in pages. Therefore the latest trunk check-in download link is found at: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/55a28e7f5a Thanks again. ^K on Dec 20, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > >On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:40 PM, K wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-20 Thread K
That is great to see. So I've looked in Download and Code, and I am still not able to figure out how I can download a snapshot of the current source of trunk. Please pardon what must be blindness on my part. ^K on Dec 20, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > >On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:40 PM, K wro

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-20 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:40 PM, K wrote: > Thank you for refining the presentation of moved-not-deleted files. > > Is this code now integrated into the primary trunk, Yes. In http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=2012-12-18&nd at 2012-12-18 02:38 you can see where the changes were merge

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-20 Thread K
Thank you for refining the presentation of moved-not-deleted files. Is this code now integrated into the primary trunk, or at least is that the intention? My question when I went to do commits for these moves just became, "how do I ensure I continue to use the improved code". Thanks again, ^K

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-17 Thread K
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:12 PM, K wrote: > > > > > >However, I'm still curious why files must split upon move? > >It isn't a requirement. The page is simply showing all artifacts that >represent a >file with a given name. That is one way to slice

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-17 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:12 PM, K wrote: > > However, I'm still curious why files must split upon move? > It isn't a requirement. The page is simply showing all artifacts that represent a file with a given name. That is one way to slice the data. You are wanting to track a file throughout its

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-17 Thread K
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:00 PM, K wrote: > > > > > > > >#2 is fixed, no longer showing moved files as deleted in the check-in >overview. Thank >you. #1 is not fixed. > > >Alternative fix is here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/aa9a2485de > >

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-17 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:00 PM, K wrote: > > > #2 is fixed, no longer showing moved files as deleted in the check-in > overview. Thank you. #1 is not fixed. > Alternative fix is here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/aa9a2485de You'll need to run "fossil rebuild" again coming from the p

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-17 Thread K
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, K wrote: > > > >I've been asked to clarify the confusion behavior I've run into. > > > >$ fossil open project.fossil > > > >$ mkdir source > >$ mkdir source/code > >$ fossil mv file.h source/code/ > >RENAME file.h sour

Re: [fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-17 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, K wrote: > I've been asked to clarify the confusion behavior I've run into. > > $ fossil open project.fossil > > $ mkdir source > $ mkdir source/code > $ fossil mv file.h source/code/ > RENAME file.h source/code/file.h > $ fossil changes > MISSINGsource/code/

[fossil-users] Clarification on file move being treated as file deletion.

2012-12-17 Thread K
I've been asked to clarify the confusion behavior I've run into. $ fossil open project.fossil $ mkdir source $ mkdir source/code $ fossil mv file.h source/code/ RENAME file.h source/code/file.h $ fossil changes MISSINGsource/code/file.h $ mv file.h source/code/ $ fossil changes RENAMEDsou