Re: [fossil-users] For your dscm-politik reading pleasure

2015-03-02 Thread Matt Welland
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:37 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matt, On 2 March 2015 at 12:14, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: The basic point made in the post by Mark Shuttleworth (in 2007 BTW) is a good one. Cleaning up or refactoring is hard to do and

Re: [fossil-users] For your dscm-politik reading pleasure

2015-03-02 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: For example, if I clean up and move things around in a Fossil repo and by force of habit do an update before a commit I *lose* some of my clean up effort when Fossil (illogically IMHO) brings back the removed files.

Re: [fossil-users] For your dscm-politik reading pleasure

2015-03-02 Thread jungle Boogie
Hi Matt, On 2 March 2015 at 12:14, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: The basic point made in the post by Mark Shuttleworth (in 2007 BTW) is a good one. Cleaning up or refactoring is hard to do and ideally an SCM tool helps the process. Tools that behave inconsistent with expectations

[fossil-users] For your dscm-politik reading pleasure

2015-03-02 Thread bch
Renames as first-class dscm operations: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/123 -bch ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] For your dscm-politik reading pleasure

2015-03-02 Thread Matt Welland
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:46 AM, bch brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Renames as first-class dscm operations: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/123 The basic point made in the post by Mark Shuttleworth (in 2007 BTW) is a good one. Cleaning up or refactoring is hard to do and ideally an