Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-27 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:31:32 -0500, Tomek Kott wrote: >You might want to take a look at the work done for SharpFossil: http://repository.mobile-developers.de/cgi-bin/ikoch/sharpfossil/index >Although it hasn't been worked on in a while, I think some of the commands >you are looking for have been

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-26 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote: > >When I downloaded the win32 fossil binary and installed it on a > 64-bit windows, I noticed that the fossil ui won't work properly due to > that it fails to launch new processes. Running command line fossil > works, but starting new fos

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 11/26/12 21:06, Richard Hipp wrote: >> fossil uses fork() quite enough, and its memory management depends on >> that, for >> what I understand. > > The "fossil ui" and "fossil server" commands use fork() on unix. But > fork() is not available on windows so we have the winhttp.c source file to

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-26 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > fossil uses fork() quite enough, and its memory management depends on > that, for > what I understand. > The "fossil ui" and "fossil server" commands use fork() on unix. But fork() is not available on windows so we have the winht

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-26 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:52:53PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote: > IIUC the main reason to want a DLL instead of having to spawn a new > process for every operation is iOS. I hear that the dearth of > excellent git (and other) SCM clients for iOS has to do with the > constrained nature of the run-ti

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-26 Thread Nico Williams
IIUC the main reason to want a DLL instead of having to spawn a new process for every operation is iOS. I hear that the dearth of excellent git (and other) SCM clients for iOS has to do with the constrained nature of the run-time environment. ___ fossil-

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-25 Thread Tomek Kott
by C# programs. Tomek > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > From: gilles.gana...@free.fr > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 22:40:11 +0100 > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL? > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:31:41 -0500, Richard Hipp > wrote: > >The current Fossil imple

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-24 Thread Gilles
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:31:41 -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: >The current Fossil implementation is not appropriate for converting into a >library due to its extensive using of global variables and due to a >cavalier attitude toward freeing allocated memory. Fossil is designed to >run a single operatio

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-24 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hello > > Unless there's a way to call fossil.exe and know how the command > ended... > > http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/688/fossilprompt.jpg > > ... is there a way to recompile the Fossil source code to turn it into > a DLL* to get

[fossil-users] Fossil as DLL?

2012-11-24 Thread Gilles
Hello Unless there's a way to call fossil.exe and know how the command ended... http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/688/fossilprompt.jpg ... is there a way to recompile the Fossil source code to turn it into a DLL* to get some feedback when calling Fossil programmatically? Since SQLit