Re: [fossil-users] Fwd: Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

2012-11-23 Thread Jacek Cała
Personally, I don't mind if you go for option (1). From the fossil timeline you mentioned ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=2012-11-21+16%3A28%3A03) it seems that it's not a big issue at all. I believe that all relevant comments can be easily edited by hand for all those who really need

Re: [fossil-users] Fwd: Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

2012-11-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:15 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I think the cleanest solution is to extend the artifact format by adding > optional mimetype fields to the > end of C and J cards (solution 3a) > > Together with this let people choose at ticket/comment creation if its > text (default) or html. >

[fossil-users] Fwd: Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

2012-11-23 Thread fossil-mail
Hi, I think the cleanest solution is to extend the artifact format by adding optional mimetype fields to the end of C and J cards (solution 3a) Together with this let people choose at ticket/comment creation if its text (default) or html. For the backward compatibility: Do old fossil bui